Mindboggling cultural relations between Ancient Sanatan and Egyptian civilization


Mindbogglingcultural relations between AncientEgyptiancivilization andHinduSanatanaDarmaIndia~ Digging deep into holy books we found amazing facts and similarities

From Australian continent to American day by day more evidence and proof been unearthed by different archeological agencies all around the world that proves connection between ancient world and Bharat that is known as India now.

Our Sanatan Dharma ancestors started migration to the new found land mass from the beginning of the ice age carried their cultural values and settled mostly on river banks which is a vital source of food.

Some of our Bharat kingdoms went in search of metals minerals like Gold silver copper zinc etc and other commodities to fuel our growth. Ancients sites are now found in Australia, Peru, Egypt, Mexico etc are connected with famous Sanatan dharma but the west cleverly disguised them as alien.

All these new civilizations of today…

View original post 605 more words


Lakulisha : An Important Chapter of Bhartiya History

#Lakulisha : An Important Chapter of Bhartiya History
Vyaas Rshi is one of the center point of bhartiya civilization and especially for the history. There are conflicting claims floating on internet regarding the birth of the great Rshi Vyas. Kurma Puran, Ling Puran and few others gives 28 birth of Vyaas in seventh Manavantar and similarly 28 birth of Rudra as Rshi. As per Ling Puran, every chaturyuga has 4 Shisyas of both Vyaas and Rudra born in start and end of #Dwapar respectively. Vyaas and his four shisyas work was to propagate and teach four vedas and Rudra avataar and his shishyas work was to keep balance of earth/shrishti by teaching of Pashupat dharm. The influence of Pashupat Dharm can be seen in world’s oldest #Sindhu Civilization’s seal which was #Pashupati. The influence could also be seen in Rongorongo by comparing similarities between the Indus and Rapa Nui writing systems and their seals plus with Inga Stone of Brazil. 
The description of both avatar goes as follows:

1st Dwapar Vyaas was Manu or Shiv and Rudra avatar was Swet Muni

2nd Vyaas name was Satya and Rudra avatar was Sutaar

3rd Vyaas name was Usna/Bhargava/Sukrachry and Rudra avatar was Daman

4th Vyas name was Angira or Brishpti and Rudra avatar was Suhotra

5th Vyaas name was Savita and Rudra avatar was Kanak

6th Vyaas name was Mrtyu (yam) and Rudra avatar was Laugakshi

7th Vyaas name was Indra named Satritu and Rudra avatar was Vibhu Rshi

8th Vyaas name was Vashistha and Rudra avatar was Dadhivahan
Similarly others are mentioned in the pic. The 28th was #Dwaipayan and 28th avatar of Rudra was #Lakuli famous as Yogaatma #Lakulish. Lakulish is famous as promoter of #Pashupat Dharma after 28th Dwapar. Yogi Lakulish is mentioned in Linga puran as 28th avatar of Shiv/Rudra in end of 28th Dwapar and promoter of yog system. The Linga puran mentions four sons of Yogi Lakuli viz Garga, Kaurushya, Mitra and Kushika. Origin and history of Lakulish (Shiva with a wooden stick) traverse back to Gujarat region of current India. 
#Jageshwar was once the center of Lakulish Shaivism. There is no definite dating of the construction of Jageshwar group of temples. The temples were renovated during the reign of Katyuri King Shalivahandev. There is an inscription of Malla Kings in the main temple indicating their devotion to Jageshwar. The Katyuri Kings also donated villages to the temple priests for its maintenance. The Chand Kings of Kumaon were also patrons of the Jageshwar temple. Numerous Jageshwar temples were constructed or restored during the Gurjara Pratihara era. See the Pic. Lakulisha among his four disciples Kusika, Garga, Mitra, and Kaurushya, rock-cut stone relief, Cave Temple No. 2 at Badami, Karnataka. The principal text of the Pashupata sect, the Pāśupata Sūtra is attributed to Lakulisha. The manuscripts of this text and a commentary of it, the Pañcārtha Bhāṣya by Kaundinya were discovered in 1930. The account matches those narrated in the various historical references in Puranas where Lakulisha incarnates as 28th Avatar. 
The four disciples of Dwaipayan made famous the teachings of Vedas. Paail (Rgved), Vaispaayan (Yajur), Sumantu (Athrva), Jaimini (Sam) and Suta Muni the historical parts likes puranas. #Kusika, #Garga, #Mitra, and #Kaurushya are described as sons of Yogi Lakuli in Ling Puran all will spend their life teaching yogic activities, living in sync with nature, protecting animals and worshipping shivling. The teachings of Pashupati did made huge impact of Bhartiya civilization where an example could be seen as #PashupatiSeal of Sindhu Saraswati Civilization. The world oldest civilization could be pretty much seen as result of hard work based on yama-niyama done by Yogi Lakulisha and his sons. Yogi Lakulisha is believed to be born in land of #Gujarat. The site of #Kayavarohana is related to Lakulisha.


#Rajarani Temple, #Lingraj Temple and many ancient temples of #Bhubneshwar is dedicated to Yogi Lakulisha. When H. Tsiang visited #Varanasi he wrote Pashupatas as major followers which is true till date. He also wrote more than 100 temples were dedicated to Shiva. Varanasi is called as world’s only ancient city inhabited continuously. Lakulisha as Siva is often enshrined, his image on the face of a Sivalinga, seated in lotus posture, virilely naked, holding a danda in his left hand and a citron fruit in his right. One of the most ancient temple “Somnath” which has faced many cycles of destruction from Islamic invaders is one of the most revered temple. Pashupatinath Temple of Nepal is also one of the ancient temple dedicated to Pashupati Dharm.


About Yogi Lakulisha 

Yogi Lakulish was said to be born to a brahmin couple named Vishvarup and Sudarshana in Kayavarohan, Gujarat during end of Dwapar. This means that he must have lived not before 4000 BC. There ancestral line went back to the great ancient sage, Atri. Lakulish was born on the fourteenth day of the bright half of the moon in the Indian month of Chaitra after midnight. A sage named Atri took same task at the end of 12th Dwapar when Vyaas was Rshi Shattej. Tracing Yogi Lakulish and his son cum shishyas can solve many mysteries of our Bhartiya Civilizations. 

It is said in all the Agamas and Tantras, that a MukhaLinga should he made on the Pujabhaga of the Sarvasama-Linga and that it might have one, two, three, four or five faces corresponding to the five aspects viz, Vaaiadeva, Tatpurusha, Aghora, Sadyojata and Ishana, of Shiva. In 1940, archaeologist M.S. Vats discovered three Shiva Lingas at Harappa, dating more than 5,000 years old. It is known to us that Shiva was seated facing south when he taught the rishis and devotees Yoga and Jnana, includes science and arts because of this, such forms of Shiva are known as #DAKSHINAMURTI. An image representing this form of Shiva is found in the left window of the Lakulish temple, adjoining to the Main Shrine in Eklingji. The Shiva Purana, has laid down that the image of Lakulisha should carry Bijora In his right hand Staff in the left one. The Vishvakarma Vastusastra also confirms this description. The images found in old Kayavarohan Tirth, Gujarat, satisfys this description. The same type of image is found in the Papkantakeshvar temple, Achalgarh, Rajasthan, Kalika temple (Chittor Fort) wherein the deity holds a Bijora in his right hand and a staff in the left one. Lakulisha in Samgameshwara temple built under patronage of early Chalukyas. In Haryana’s Morni and Tikkar Tal Lakulisha images were excavated and can be found in Government Musem and Art Gallery, Chandigarh. The remains and fort of Morni Lake suggests a big civilization once propagated there. There is mention of Pasupatacharya named #Udita who was student of #Upamita who was student of #Kapila who belonged to Chandragupta period. The earliest images of Lakulisa from Mathura datable to 5th -6th CE show him seated with two arms can be seen in State Museum, Lucknow. 
Lakulisha and Kusika.

Lakulisha among his four disciples Kusika, Garga, Mitra, and Kaurushya; #Kushika is believed to be first disciple finds mention in Pasupata Sutra (PS) and Pancarthabhasya (Pbh). Both these texts talk about his getting directly initiated by Lakulisa in Ujjain. The Udaipur Inscription of Naravahana refers to Kusika and records that ascetics who besmear their bodies with ashes and wear barks and have matted hair, appeared in his line. The dynastic patronage to early Lakulisa-Pasupatas can be seen clearly at cave temples of #Jogesvari, #Elephanta, #Manddapesvar and later at #Ellora. In medieval South India, there was an influential sect called the #Kalamukhas some believe that Kalamukha sect was derived from, or was another name for, the Lakulisha-Pashupatas. According to some sources, Basavadeva, the reformer of Vira Shaivism, was initiated by a Kalamukha ascetic. Lakulisha and his Shishyas are very important historical figure which needs a good research for better understanding of Sapta Sidhu Civilizations and history of Pashupat history in this kaliyuga. 


Notes and References

[1] Rudra Puran, Shiv Puran


[3] http://www.hillsofmorni.com/history-of-morni/glimpses-of-history-excavations-at-morni-ka-tal/ 


[5] Huntington Susan, ‘Art of AncientIndia ‘p. 75

[6] Spink Walter, ‘Ajanta to Ellora ‘1967

[7] http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=13273

[8] http://www.ancient-wisdom.com/easterislandindusvalley1.htm

Queen Padmavati- real history in Hindi 

रानी पद्मावती का रोचक इतिहास व कहानी | Rani Padmavati रानी पद्मिनी / रानी पद्मावती का इतिहास व कहानी 


Rani Padmavati History in Hindi
भारतीय इतिहास के पन्नों में अत्यंत सुंदर और साहसी रानी; रानी पद्मावती का उल्लेख है। रानी पद्मावती को रानी पद्मिनी के नाम से भी जाना जाता है। रानी पद्मावती के पिता सिंघल प्रांत (श्रीलंका) के राजा थे। उनका नाम गंधर्वसेन था। और उनकी माता का नाम चंपावती था। पद्मावती बाल्य काल से ही दिखने में अत्यंत सुंदर और आकर्षक थीं। उनके माता-पिता नें उन्हे बड़े लाड़-प्यार से बड़ा किया था। कहा जाता है बचपन में पद्मावती के पास एक बोलता तोता था जिसका नाम हीरामणि रखा गया था।
रानी पद्मावती का स्वयंवर

महाराज गंधर्वसेन नें अपनी पुत्री पद्मावती के विवाह के लिए उनका स्वयंवर रचाया था जिस में भाग लेने के लिए भारत के अगल अलग हिन्दू राज्यों के राजा-महाराजा आए थे। गंधर्वसेन के राज दरबार में लगी राजा-महाराजाओं की भीड़ में एक छोटे से राज्य का पराक्रमी राजा मल्खान सिंह भी आया था। उसी स्वयंवर में विवाहित राजा रावल रत्न सिंह भी मौजूद थे। उन्होनें मल्खान सिंह को स्वयंवर में परास्त कर के रानी पद्मिनी पर अपना अधिकार सिद्ध किया और उनसे धाम-धूम से विवाह रचा लिया। इस तरह राजा रावल रत्न सिंह अपनी दूसरी पत्नी रानी पद्मावती को स्वयंवर में जीत कर अपनी राजधानी चित्तौड़ वापस लौट गये।

चित्तौड़ राज्य

प्रजा प्रेमी और न्याय पालक राजा रावल रत्न सिंह चित्तौड़ राज्य को बड़े कुशल तरीके से चला रहे थे। उनके शासन में वहाँ की प्रजा हर तरह से सुखी समपन्न थीं। राजा रावल रत्न सिंह रण कौशल और राजनीति में निपुण थे। उनका भव्य दरबार एक से बढ़कर एक महावीर योद्धाओं से भरा हुआ था। चित्तौड़ की सैन्य शक्ति और युद्ध कला दूर-दूर तक मशहूर थी।
ये भी पढ़ें: खूब लड़ी मर्दानी वो तो झांसी वाली रानी थी

चित्तौड़ का प्रवीण संगीतकार राघव चेतन

चित्तौड़ राज्य में राघव चेतन नाम का संगीतकार बहुत प्रसिद्ध था। महाराज रावल रत्न सिंह उन्हे बहुत मानते थे इसीलिये राज दरबार में राघव चेतन को विशेष स्थान दिया गया था। चित्तौड़ प्रजा और वहाँ के महाराज को उन दिनों यह बात मालूम नहीं थी की राघव चेतन संगीत कला के अतिरिक्त जादू-टोना भी जनता था। ऐसा कहा जाता है की राघव चेतन अपनी इस आसुरी प्रतिभा का उपयोग शत्रु को परास्त करने और अपने कार्य सिद्ध करने में करता था। एक दिन राघव चेतन जब अपना कोई तांत्रिक कार्य कर रहा था तब उसे रंगे हाथों पकड़ लिया गया और राजदरबार में राजा रावल रत्न सिंह के समक्ष पेश कर दिया गया। सभी साक्ष्य और फरियादी पक्ष की दलील सुन कर महाराज नें चेतन राघव को दोषी पाया और तुरंत उसका मुंह काला करा कर गधे पर बैठा कर देश निकाला दे दिया।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी से मिला राघव चेतन

अपने अपमान और राज्य से निर्वासित किये जाने पर राघव चेतन बदला लेने पर आमादा हो गया। अब उसके जीवन का एक ही लक्ष्य रहे गया था और वह था चित्तौड़ के महाराज रावल रत्न सिंह का सम्पूर्ण विनाश। अपने इसी उद्देश के साथ वह दिल्ली राज्य चला गया। वहां जाने का उसका मकसद दिल्ली के बादशाह अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को उकसा कर चित्तौड़ पर आक्रमण करवा कर अपना प्रतिशोध पूरा करने का था।
12वीं और 13वीं सदी में दिल्ली की गद्दी पर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी का राज था। उन दिनों दिल्ली के बादशाह से मिलना इतना आसान कार्य नहीं था। इसीलिए राघव चेतन दिल्ली के पास स्थित एक जंगल में अपना डेरा डाल कर रहने लगता है क्योंकि वह जानता था कि दिल्ली का बादशाह अलाउद्दीन खिलजी शिकार का शौक़ीन है और वहाँ पर उसकी भेंट ज़रूर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी से हो जाएगी। कुछ दिन इंतज़ार करने के बाद आखिर उसे सब्र का फल मिल जाता है।

एक दिन अलाउद्दीन खिलजी अपने खास सुरक्षा कर्मी लड़ाकू दस्ते के साथ घने जंगल में शिकार खेलने पहुँचता है। मौका पा कर ठीक उसी वक्त राघव चेतन अपनी बांसुरी बजाना शुरू करता है। कुछ ही देर में बांसुरी के सुर बादशाह अलाउद्दीन खिलजी और उसके दस्ते के सिपाहियों के कानों में पड़ते हैं। अलाउद्दीन खिलजी फ़ौरन राघव चेतन को अपने पास बुला लेता है राज दरबार में आ कर अपना हुनर प्रदर्शित करने का प्रस्ताव देता है। तभी चालाक राघव चेतन अलाउद्दीन खिलजी से कहता है-
आप मुझ जैसे साधारण कलकार को अपनें राज्य दरबार की शोभा बना कर क्या पाएंगे, अगर हासिल ही करना है तो अन्य समपन्न राज्यों की ओर नज़र दौड़ाइये जहां एक से बढ़ कर एक बेशकीमती नगीने मौजूद हैं और उन्हे जीतना और हासिल करना भी सहज है।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी तुरंत राघव चेतन को पहेलिया बुझानें की बजाए साफ-साफ अपनी बात बताने को कहता हैं। तब राघव चेतन चित्तौड़ राज्य की सैन्य शक्ति, चित्तौड़ गढ़ की सुरक्षा और वहाँ की सम्पदा से जुड़ा एक-एक राज़ खोल देता है और राजा रावल रत्न सिंह की धर्म पत्नी रानी पद्मावती के अद्भुत सौन्दर्य का बखान भी कर देता है। यह सब बातें जान कर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी चित्तौड़ राज्य पर आक्रमण कर के वहाँ की सम्पदा लूटने, वहाँ कब्ज़ा करने और परम तेजस्वी रूप रूप की अंबार रानी पद्मावती को हासिल करने का मन बना लेता है।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की चित्तौड़ राज्य पर आक्रमण की योजना

Rani Padmavati Biography in Hindi
राघव चेतन की बातें सुन कर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें कुछ ही दिनों में चित्तौड़ राज्य पर आक्रमण करने का मन बना लिया और अपनी एक विशाल सेना चित्तौड़ राज्य की और रवाना कर दी। अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की सेना चित्तौड़ तक पहुँच तो गयी पर चित्तौड़ के किले की अभेद्य सुरक्षा देख कर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की पूरी सेना स्तब्ध हो गयी। उन्होने वहीं किले के आस पास अपने पड़ाव डाल लिए और चित्तौड़ राज्य के किले की सुरक्षा भेदने का उपाय ढूँढने लगे।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें राजा रावल रत्न सिंह को भेजा कपट संदेश

जब से राजा रावल रत्न सिंह नें रूप सुंदरी रानी पद्मावती को स्वयमर में जीता था तभी से पद्मावती अपनी सुंदरता के लिये दूर-दूर तक चर्चा का विषय बनी हुई थी। इस बात का फायदा उठाते हुए कपटी अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें चित्तौड़ किले के अंदर राजा रावल रत्न सिंह के पास एक संदेश भिजवाया कि वह रानी पद्मावती की सुंदरता का बखान सुन कर उनके दीदार के लिये दिल्ली से यहाँ तक आये हैं और अब एक बार रूप सुंदरी रानी पद्मावती को दूर से देखने का अवसर चाहते हैं।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें यहाँ तक कहा की वह रानी पद्मावती को अपनी बहन समान मानते हैं और वह सिर्फ उसे दूर से एक नज़र देखने की ही तमन्ना रखते हैं।
चित्तौड़ के महाराज रावल रत्न सिंह का अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को जवाब

अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की इस अजीब मांग को राजपूत मर्यादा के विरुद्ध बता कर राजा रावल रत्न सिंह नें ठुकरा दिया। पर फिर भी अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें रानी पद्मावती को बहन समान बताया था इसलिये उस समय एक रास्ता निकाला गया। पर्दे के पीछे रानी पद्मावती सीढ़ियों के पास से गुज़रेंगी और सामने एक विशाल काय शीशा रखा जाएगा जिसमें रानी पद्मावती का प्रतिबिंम अलाउद्दीन खिलजी देख सकते हैं। इस तरह राजपूतना मर्यादा भी भंग ना होगी और अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की बात भी रह जायेगी।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें दिया धोखा

शर्त अनुसार चित्तौड़ के महाराज ने अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को आईने में रानी पद्मावती का प्रतिबिंब दिखला दिया और फिर अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को खिला-पिला कर पूरी महेमान नवाज़ी के साथ चित्तौड़ किले के सातों दरवाज़े पार करा कर उनकी सेना के पास छोड़ने खुद गये। इसी अवसर का लाभ ले कर कपटी अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें राजा रावल रत्न सिंह को बंदी बना लिया और किले के बाहर अपनी छावनी में कैद कर दिया।
 इसके बाद संदेश भिजवा दिया गया कि –
अगर महाराज रावल रत्न सिंह को जीवित देखना है तो रानी पद्मावती को फौरन अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की खिदमद में किले के बाहर भेज दिया जाये।
रानी पद्मावती, चौहान राजपूत सेनापति गौरा और बादल की युक्ति

चित्तौड़ राज्य के महाराज को अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की गिरफ्त से सकुशल मुक्त कराने के लिये रानी पद्मावती, गौरा और बादल नें मिल कर एक योजना बनाई। इस योजना के तहत किले के बाहर मौजूद अलाउद्दीन खिलजी तक यह पैगाम भेजना था की रानी पद्मावती समर्पण करने के लिये तैयार है और पालकी में बैठ कर किले के बाहर आने को राज़ी है। और फिर पालकी में रानी पद्मावती और उनकी सैकड़ों दासीयों की जगह नारी भेष में लड़ाके योद्धा भेज कर बाहर मौजूद दिल्ली की सेना पर आक्रमण कर दिया जाए और इसी अफरातफरी में राजा रावल रत्न सिंह को अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की कैद से मुक्त करा लिया जाये।

रानी पद्मावती के इंतज़ार में बावरा हुआ अलाउद्दीन खिलजी

कहा जाता है की वासना और लालच इन्सान की बुद्धि हर लेती है। अलाउद्दीन खिलजी के साथ भी ऐसा ही हुआ। जब चित्तौड़ किले के दरवाज़े एक के बाद एक खुले तब अंदर से एक की जगह सैकड़ों पालकियाँ बाहर आने लगी। जब यह पूछा गया की इतनी सारी पालकियाँ क्यूँ साथ हैं तब अलाउद्दीन खिलजी को यह उत्तर दिया गया की यह सब रानी पद्मावती की खास दासीयों का काफिला है जो हमेशा उनके साथ जाता है।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी रानी पद्मावती पर इतना मोहित था की उसने इस बात की पड़ताल करना भी ज़रूरी नहीं समझा की सभी पालकियों को रुकवा कर यह देखे कि उनमें वाकई में दासियाँ ही है। और इस तरह चित्तौड़ का एक पूरा लड़ाकू दस्ता नारी भेष में किले के बाहर आ पहुंचा। कुछ ही देर में अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें रानी पद्मावती की पालकी अलग करवा दी और परदा हटा कर उनका दीदार करना चाहा। तो उसमें से राजपूत सेनापति गौरा निकले और उन्होने आक्रमण कर दिया। उसी वक्त चित्तौड़ सिपाहीयों नें भी हमला कर दिया और वहाँ मची अफरातफरी में बादल नें राजा रावल रत्न सिंह को बंधन मुक्त करा लिया और उन्हे अलाउद्दीन खिलजी के अस्तबल से चुराये हुए घोड़े पर बैठा कर सुरक्षित चित्तौड़ किले के अंदर पहुंचा दिया। इस लड़ाई मे राजपूत सेनापति गौरा और पालकी के संग बाहर आये सभी योद्धा शहीद हो गये।
अलाउद्दीन खिलजी का आक्रमण

अपनी युक्ति नाकाम हो जाने की वजह से बादशाह अलाउद्दीन खिलजी झल्ला उठा उसनें उसी वक्त चित्तौड़ किले पर आक्रमण कर दिया पर वे उस अभेद्य किले में दाखिल नहीं हो सके। तब उन्होने किले में खाद्य और अन्य ज़रूरी चीजों के खत्म होने तक इंतज़ार करने का फैसला लिया। कुछ दिनों में किले के अंदर खाद्य आपूर्ति समाप्त हो गयी और वहाँ के निवासी किले की सुरक्षा से बाहर आ कर लड़ मरने को मजबूर हो गये। अंत में रावल रत्न सिंह नें द्वार खोल कर आर- पार की लड़ाई लड़ने का फैसला कर लिया और किले के दरवाज़े खोल दिये। किले की घेराबंदी कर के राह देख रहे मौका परस्त अलाउद्दीन खिलजी ने और उसकी सेना नें दरवाज़ा खुलते ही तुरंत आक्रमण कर दिया।
इस भीषण युद्ध में पराक्रमी राजा रावल रत्न सिंह वीर गति हो प्राप्त हुए और उनकी पूरी सेना भी हार गयी। अलाउद्दीन खिलजी नें एक-एक कर के सभी राजपूत योद्धाओं को मार दिया और किले के अंदर घुसने की तैयारी कर ली।
चित्तौड़ की महारानी पद्मावती और नगर की सभी महिलाओं नें लिया जौहर करने का फैसला

Rani Padmavati Story in Hindi
युद्ध में राजा रावल रत्न सिंह के मारे जाने और चित्तौड़ सेना के समाप्त हो जाने की सूचना पाने के बाद रानी पद्मावती जान चुकी थी कि अब अलाउद्दीन खिलजी की सेना किले में दाखिल होते ही चित्तौड़ के आम नागरिक पुरुषों और बच्चों को मौत के घाट उतार देगी और औरतों को गुलाम बना कर उन पर अत्याचार करेगी। इसलिये राजपूतना रीति अनुसार वहाँ की सभी महिलाओं नें जौहर करने का फैसला लिया।
जौहर की रीति निभाने के लिए नगर के बीच एक बड़ा सा अग्नि कुंड बनाया गया और रानी पद्मावती और अन्य महिलाओं ने एक के बाद एक महिलायेँ उस धधकती चिता में कूद कर अपने प्राणों की बलि दे दी।
इतिहास में राजा रावल रत्न सिंह, रानी और पद्मावती, सेना पति गौरा और बादल का नाम सुनहरे अक्षरों में लिखा गया है और चित्तौड़ की सेना वहाँ के आम नागरिक भी सम्मान के साथ याद किये जाते हैं जिनहोने अपनी जन्म भूमि की रक्षा के खातिर अपने प्राणों का बलिदान दिया।

We are grateful to Mr. Paresh Barai for sharing Rani Padmavati Histoy in Hindi.
Note: The Rani Padmavti Biography in Hindi is based upon Malik Muhammad Jayasi’s poem Padmavati written in the 15th century. However, many historians believe it to be a work of fiction.
Note: Padmavati is also an upcoming Indian movie directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Deepika Padukone will be playing the role of Padmavati in this film. Although its story may not be same as mentioned in this article.

Glorified Terrorist muslim Kings of India 

Terrorist Aurangzeb was Curse on Humanity: Killer of 4.6 Million Hindus

 From krishnabhakt.com
Aurangzeb was a religious bigot, very cunning, cruel and wicked towards Hindus; true to the teachings of koran. He reversed in every respect some of the regime friendly policies of his predecessors which were based on Hindu texts.
After killing his own brothers who were bit moderate compared to aurangzeb and putting his father behind bars; barbaric aurangzeb took full control of regime and continued his fanatic way of leading a life of a terrorist muslim by forcibly converting Hindus into islam and killing those who wanted to follow Hinduism.
Why Talibans and terrorists of today revere aurangzeb can be known from the fact that he outlawed music and other performances in 1668. All artists were forbidden to sing, play musical instruments or to dance or paint or practice art. Anything that had to with moral plays, kathas even Ram Leelas were deemed illegal by fanatic aurangzeb.

1 Destructed Hindu Temples

2 Ruining Vedic Symbols for Islamization

3 Aurangzeb Followed Legacy of Terrorism Taught by his Cruel Muslim Ancestors and Islam

4 Terrorist Aurangzeb Conducted Brutal Killings of Brave Sikhs and Over 4.6 Million of Hindus

5 Raja Shambhaji (son of Shivaji) Killed on Aurungzeb’s Orders

6 The Image Below Shows Global Population Decline by Massacre – Flashbacking Hundreds of Years

7 Accounts of Temple Destruction by Historians of Aurangzeb

8 1. “Mir’at-i-Alam” by Bakhtawar Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

9 2. “Alamgir-Nama” by Mirza Muhammad Kazim Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

10 3. “Mas’ir-i-‘Alamgiri” by Saqi Must’ad Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

11 4. “Akhbarat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

12 5. “Fathiyya-i-‘Ibriyya” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

13 6. “Kalimat-i-Tayyibat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah

14 7. “Ganj-i-Arshadi” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

15 8. “Kalimat-i-Aurangzeb” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah

16 9. “Muraq’at-i-Abu’I Hasan” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Maulana Abu’l Hasan

17 10. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Ishwardas Nagar

18 How a Hindu Ruler Followed Vedic Ritual Contrary to Cruel Islamic Belief

19 Surprise Me More:

Destructed Hindu Temples

In 1669, on hearing that certain Brahmins were giving religious lectures at Multan and Benares, he ordered ‘all governors of provinces to destroy with a willing hand the schools and temples of the Hindus. Inconsequence, the temple of Vishwanath at Benares was destroyed [Maasiri Alamgiri, which recorded numerous orders for and reports of destructions of temples. Its entry for 2 September 1669 details: “News came to court that in accordance with the Emperor’s command his officers had demolished the temple of Vishvanath at Banaras”]. Moreover, till today, the old Kashi Vishvanath temple wall is visible as a part of the walls of the Gyanvapi mosque which Aurangzeb had built at the site.
[Root Cause is Islam and 164 Terrorism Verses of Koran]
In 1672 a Hindu religious sect called the Satnamis rebelled, and was crushed with ruthless severity. In 1675, Tegh Bahadur, the ninth of the sikh gurus was taken and executed because he refused to embrace Islam.
The history of his islamic reign was over a period of nearly fifty years, spent mostly in hatred towards Hindus. Terrorist aurangzeb’s rule was gory saga of loot, r@pe, killing and genocide of Hindus.
Aurangzeb Rotting in Hell for killing Hindus and Demolishing Hindu Temples
In 1678, Raja Jaswant Singh of Marwar died. The emperor tried to seize his children and have them brought up as fanatic muslims. He adopted the same policy towards the young Maratha Prince Shahu. Finally in 1679 he induced heavy jizya or poll-tax to earn revenues from Hindus. His one track mind of hating Hindus but not administrating the regime properly paved the way for the British conquest of India.
Ruining Vedic Symbols for Islamization

Muntakhabu-l Lubab by Khafi Khan:

How much Aurangzeb Hated Hindus

1. “In the former reigns one side of the coins had been adorned with the words of the creed and the names of the first four Caliphs; but as the coins pass into many unworthy places, and may fall under feet of Hindus, it was ordered that this superscription should be changed.”
How Scientific calendar representing Vedic fire worshipping format was changed to less accurate Mohammedan calendar

2. “Since the reign of Emperor Akbar the official year of account and the years of the reign had been reckoned from the Ist Farwadi, when the sun enters Aries, to the end of Isfandiyar, and the year and the months were called Ilahi; but resembled the system of the fire worshippers, the Emperor in his zeal for upholding the Muhameddan rule, emphasis added) directed that the year of the reign should be reckoned by the Arab lunar year and months, and that the revenue accounts also the lunar year should be preferred to the solar. The festival of the solar new year was completely abolished.”
Aurangzeb Followed Legacy of Terrorism Taught by his Cruel Muslim Ancestors and Islam
Contemporary history leaves no doubt that Aurangzeb conducted the affairs of the State in accordance with the dictates of Islam. And for that matter Aurangzeb was not unique in destroying the temples of the Hindus and neither was it limited to India. A practice of demolishing or breaking idols started by founder of islam, Mohammed, has continued to this day. The recent manifestation being destruction of Buddha statues at Bamiyan in Afghanistan and demolition of hundreds of Hindu, non-muslim temples in pakistan, bangladesh and burma.
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
Islamic literary sources provide far more extensive evidence of temple destruction by the Muslim invaders of India in medieval times. They also cover a large area, from Sinkiang and Transoxiana in the North to Tamil Nadu in the South, and from Siestan province of present day Iran in the West to Assam in the East. This vast area, which was long the cradle of hindu culture, came to be littered with the ruins of temples and monasteries, belonging to all schools of Santana Dharma – Baudhha, Jaina, Shaiva, Sakta, Vaishnava, and the rest. Archaeological explorations and excavations in modern times have proved unmistakably that most of the mosques, mazars, ziarats and dargahs which were built in this area, stood on the sites of and were made from the materials of deliberately demolished Hindu monuments.
Hundreds of medieval muslim historians who flourished in India and elsewhere in the world of Islam, have written detailed accounts of what their heroes did in various parts of the extensive Hindu homeland as they were invaded one after another. It is alear from the literary evidence collected alone that all Muslim rulers destroyed or desecrated Hindu temples whenever and wherever they could. Archaeological evidence from various Muslim monuments, particularly mosques and dargahs, not only confirms the literary evidence but also adds the names of some Muslim rulers whom Muslim historians have failed to credit with this pious performance.
Terrorist Aurangzeb Conducted Brutal Killings of Brave Sikhs and Over 4.6 Million of Hindus
Dyal Das, Mati Das and Sati Das as well as the Guru were brought to the open space in front of the Kotwali (Mati Das and Sati das were brothers, they were former Brahmins and belong to the area of Jammu, instead of converting to islam favored Sikhism). First of all Bhai Mati das was asked to become a Muslim. He replied that Sikhism was true and Islam was false. If God had favoured Islam, he would have created all men circumised. He was at once tied between two posts, and while standing erect, was sawn across from head to loins. He faced the savage operation with such compusure tranquility and fortitude that Sikh theologians included his name in the daily prayers (Ardas).
Bhai Mati Das Killed by aurangzeb
Dyal Das abused the Emperor and his courtiers at this atrocious act. He was tied up like a bundle with an iron chain and was put into large cauldron of bowling oil. He was roasted alive into a block of charcoal. Sati Das condemned the brutalities. He was hacked to pieces limb by limb. Jaita a Rangreta sikh of delhi collected the remains of these martyrs and consigned them to the river Yamuna flowing at a stone’s throw.
Dyal Das Killed by aurangzeb
Guru Tegh Bahadur Singh Killed by aurangzeb
Raja Shambhaji (son of Shivaji) Killed on Aurungzeb’s Orders
Succeeding his great father Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in April 1680, his elder son Shambhaji continued the fight against the Mughals most spiritedly for the preservation and also extension of Swarajya.
Unfortunately, a single but grave mistake and over confidence in his own safe and secure position at Sangameshwar, nestling amidst the Western Ghats, led to his chance capture along with Kavikalash and a number of other Marathas who were with him.
[Akabar Was Barbaric, Cruel and Anti-Hindu King]
On the 15th February 1689, Shambhaji and Kavi Kalash were brought to the Imperial camp dressed as buffons with long fool’s caps and bells placed on their heads, mounted on camels, with drums beating, with thousands of onlookers lining the roads. Aurangzeb was sitting in full darbar, and, at the sight of the prisoners, “descended from the throne and kneeling down on the carpet bowed his head to the ground in double thankfulness to the (anti-god) allah for this crowning victory”. Shambhaji spurned at the offer of life and loosened his tongue in abuse of the Emperor. That very night his eyes were blinded and next day the tongue of Kavi Kalash was cut out. The Muslim clerics decreed that Shambhaji should be put to death.
After undergoing a fortnight of torture and insult, on February,1689, the captives were put to a cruel and painful death on the 11th March, their limbs being hacked off one by one and their flesh thrown to the dogs. Their severed heads were stuffed with straw and exhibited in all the chief cities of the Deccan to the accompaniment of drum and trumpet (Maasir-i-‘Alamgiri, 320-25; Muntakhab-ul-Lubab, 386-88, Sarkar, Aurangzeb, IV, pp.340-44).
Sambhaji Killed by Terrorist Aurangzeb
In the painting, the entire sequence of events after Shambhaji’s arrival in the camp, his cruel death and barbaric manner in which his body was cut into pieces and fed to dogs of tulapur, have been brought out alive. The courageous manner in which Shambhaji braved death made him a martyr and washed of his earlier mistakes and actions in the eyes of the people.
The Image Below Shows Global Population Decline by Massacre – Flashbacking Hundreds of Years
Click on the image for an enlarged View
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
The Image below is closeup snapshot of main image showing that Aurangzeb killed 4.6 millions of Hindus
4.6 millions of Hindus were killed by jihadi aurangzeb for koran and islam
Accounts of Temple Destruction by Historians of Aurangzeb
Some of the literary evidence of temple destruction during Aurangzeb’s rule is listed below.
1. “Mir’at-i-Alam” by Bakhtawar Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
The author was a nobleman of Aurangzeb’s court. He died in AD 1684. the history ascribed to him was really compiled by Muhammad Baqa of Saharanpur who gave the name of his friend as its author. Baqa was a prolific writer who was invited by Bakhtawar Khan to Aurangzeb’s court and given a respectable rank. He died in AD 1683.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) General Order
” …Hindu writers have been entirely excluded from holding public offices, and ALL THE WORSHIPPING PLACES OF THE INFIDELS AND GREAT TEMPLES of these infamous people HAVE BEEN THROWN DOWN AND DESTROYED in a manner which excites astonishment at the successful completion of so difficult a task. His Majesty personally teaches the sacred kalima to many infidels with success. … All mosques in the empire are repaired at public expense…”
2. “Alamgir-Nama” by Mirza Muhammad Kazim Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
This work, written in AD 1688 contains a history of the first ten years of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) Palamau (Bihar)
” …In 1661 Aurangzeb in his zeal to uphold the law of Islam sent orders to his viceroy in Bihar, Daud Khan, to conquer Palamau. In the military operations that followed MANY TEMPLES WERE DESTROYED…”
Koch Bihar (Bengal)
” …Towards the end of the same year when Mir Jumla made a war on the Raja of Kuch Bihar, the MUGHALS DESTROYED MANY TEMPLES during the course of their operations. IDOLS WERE BROKEN AND SOME TEMPLES WERE CONVERTED INTO MOSQUES. …”
3. “Mas’ir-i-‘Alamgiri” by Saqi Must’ad Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
The author completed this history in 1710 at the behest of Inayatu”llah Khan Kashmiri, Aurangzeb’s last secretary and favorite disciple in state policy and religiosity. The materials which Must’ad Khan used in this history of Aurangzeb’s reign came mostly from the State archives.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) General Order
“…The Lord Cherisher of the faith learnt that in the provinces of Tatta, Multan, and especially at Benaras, the Brahmin misbelievers used to teach their false books in their established schools, and that admirers and students both Hindu and Muslim, used to come from great distances to these misguided men in order to acquire this vile learning. His majesty, eager to establish Islam, issues orders to the governors of all the provinces TO DEMOLISH THE SCHOOLS AND TEMPLES OF THE INFIDELS and with utmost urgency put down the teaching and the public practice of the religion of these misbelievers…”
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)
” …It was reported that, according to the Emperor’s command, his officers HAD DEMOLISHED THE TEMPLE OF VISHWANATH AT KASHI. …” Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … During this month of Ramzan abounding in miracles, the Emperor as the promoter of justice and overthrower of mischief, as the knower of truth and destroyer of oppression, as the zephyr of the garden of victory and the reviver of the faith of the Prophet, ISSUED ORDERS FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE TEMPLE SITUATED IN MATHURA FAMOUS AS THE DEHRA OF KESHO RAI. In the short time by the great exertions of his officers the DESTRUCTION OF THIS STRONG FOUNDATION OF INFIDELITY WAS ACCOMPLISHED AND ON ITS SITE A LOFTY MOSQUE WAS BUILT at the expenditure of a large sum…”
” …Praised be the August God of the faith of Islam, that in the auspicious reign of this DESTROYER OF INFIDELITY AND TURBULENCE, such a wonderful and seemingly impossible work was successfully accomplished. On seeing this instance of strength of the Emperor’s faith and the grandeur of his devotion to God, the proud Rajas were stifled and in amazement they stood like images facing the wall. THE IDOLS, LARGE AND SMALL SET WITH COSTLY JEWELS WHIC HAD BEEN SET UP IN THE TEMPLE WERE BROUGHT TO AGRA AND BURIED UNDER THE STEPS OF THE MOSQUE OF BEGUM SAHIB, IN ORDER TO BE CONTINUALLY TRODDEN UPON. The name of Mathura was changed to Islamabad. …”
Khandela (Rajasthan)
” … Darab Khan who had been sent with a strong force to punish the Rajputs of Khandela and TO DEMOLISH THE GREAT TEMPLE OF THE PLACE, attacked on March 8th/Safar 5th, and slew the three hundred and odd men who made a bold defence, not one of them escaping alive. THE TEMPLES OF KHANDELA AND SANULA AND ALL OTHER TEMPLES IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD WERE DEMOLISHED …”
Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
” … On 24th Rabi S. (Sunday, May 25th), Khan Jahan Bahadur came from Jodhpur, AFTER DEMOLISHING THE TEMPLES and bringing with himself some cart-loads of idols, and had audience of the Emperor, who higly praised him and ordered that the idols, which were mostly jewelled, golden, silver, bronze, copper, or stone, should be cast in the yard (jilaukhanah) of the Court AND UNDER THE STEPS OF THE JAMA MOSQUE, TO BE TRODDEN UPON…”
Udaipur (Rajasthan)
” … Ruhullah Khan and Ekkataz Khan WENT TO DEMOLISH THE GREAT TEMPLE in front of the Rana’s palace, which was one of the rarest buildings of the age and the chief cause of the destruction of the life and property of the despised worshippers. Twenty ‘machator’ Rajputs who were sitting in the Temple vowed to give up their lives; first one of them came out to fight, killed some and was them himself slain, then came out another and so on, until every one of the twenty perished, after killing a large number of the imperialists including the trusted slave Ikhlas. The Temple was found empty. THE HEWERS BROKE THE IMAGES. …”
” …On Saturday, the 24th January, 1680 (2nd Muharram), the Emperor went to view lake Udaisagar, constructed by the Rana, AND ORDERED ALL THE THREE TEMPLES ON ITS BANKS TO BE DEMOLISHED. …”
” …On the 29th January/7th Muharram, Hasan Ali Khan brought to the Emperor twenty camel-loads of tents and other things captured from the Rana’s Palace and REPORTED THAT ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-TWO OTHER TEMPLES IN THE ENVIRONS OF UDAIPUR HAD BEEN DESTROYED. The Khan received the title of Bahadur Alamgirshahi…”
Amber (Rajasthan)
“… Abu Turab, who had been SENT TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLES of AMBER, returned to the Court on Tuesday August 10th (Rajab 24th), and reported that HE HAD PULLED DOWN SIXTY-SIX TEMPLES. …”
Bijapur (Karnataka)
” … Hamiduddin Khan Bahadur WHO HAD GONE TO DEMOLISH A TEMPLE AND BUILD A MOSQUE (IN ITS PLACE) in Bijapur, having excellently carried his orders, came to court and gained praise and the post of darogha of gusulkhanah, which brought him near the Emperor’s person…”
General Text
“…LARGE NUMBERS OF PLACES OF WORSHIP OF THE INFIDELS AND GREAT TEMPLES OF THESE WICKED PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THROWN DOWN AND DESOLATED. Men who can see only the outside of things are filled with wonder at the successful accomplishment of such a seemingly difficult task. AND ON THE SITES OF THE TEMPLES LOFTY MOSQUES HAVE BEEN BUILT…”
Cruel Muslims Killing Hindus, Sikhs under aurangzeb
4. “Akhbarat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
These were reports from different provinces compiled in the reign of Aurangzeb.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707)
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … The emporer learning that in the temple of Keshav Rai at Mathura there was a stone railing presented by Dara Shikoh, remarked, ‘In the Muslim faith it is a sin even to look at a temple, and this Dara Shikoh had restored a railing in a temple. This fact is not creditable to the Muhammadans. REMOVE THE RAILING.’ By his order Abdun Nabi Khan (the faujdar of Mathura) REMOVED IT…”
Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh)
[Why Hindus Should Never Trust Muslims]
” … News came from Malwa that Wazir Khan had sent Gada Beg, a slave, with 400 troopers, TO DESTROY ALL TEMPLES AROUND UJJAIN… A Rawat of the place resisted and slew Gada Beg with 121 of his men…”
Aurangabad (Maharashtra)
“…… The Emperor learnt from a secret news writer of Delhi that in Jaisinghpura Bairagis used to worship idols, and that the Censor on hearing of it had gone there, arrested Sri Krishna Bairagis and taken him with 15 idols away to his house; then the Rajputs had assembled, flocked to the Censor’s house, wounded three footmen of the Censor and tried to seize the Censor himself; so that the latter set the Bairagis free and sent the copper idols to the local subahdar …”
Pandharpur (Maharashtra)
“… The Emperor, summoning Muhammad Khalil and Khidmat Rai, the darogha of hatchet-men …. ORDERED THEM TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLE OF PANDHARPUR, and to take the butchers of the camp there AND SLAUGHTER COWS IN THE TEMPLE … It was done…”
On Way to the Deccan
” … When the war with the Rajputs was over, Aurangzeb decided to leave for the Deccan. His march seems to have been marked with A DESTRUCTION TO MANY TEMPLES on the way. On May 21, 1681, the superintendent of the labourers WAS ORDERED TO DESTROY ALL THE TEMPLES on the route…”
Lakheri ( ? – means the place is not traceable today )
” … On 27 Sept., 1681, the emperor issued orders FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLES at Lakheri…”
Rasulpur ( ? )
“… About this time, April 14, 1692, orders were issued to the provincial governor and the district faujdar TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLES at Rasulpur…”
Sheogaon ( ? )
” … Sankar, a messenger, was sent TO DEMOLISH A TEMPLE near Sheogaon..”
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
“… Bijai Singh and several other Hindus were reported to be carrying on public worship of idols in a temple in the neighborhood of Ajmer. On 23 June, 1694, THE GOVERNER OF AJMER WAS ORDERED TO DESTROY THE TEMPLE and stop the public adoration of idol worship there…”
Wakenkhera ( ? )
Bhagwant Garh (Rajasthan)
“… The newswriter of Ranthambore REPORTED THE DESTRUCTION OF A TEMPLE IN PARGANAH BHAGWANT GARH. Gaj Singh Gor had repaired the temple and made some additions thereto…”
Malpura (Rajasthan)
” … Royal orders FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF TEMPLES IN MALPURA TODA were received and the officers were assigned for this work…”
remove road names on mughal rulers name no aurangzeb road
5. “Fathiyya-i-‘Ibriyya” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
This is a diary of Mir Jumla’s campaigns in Kuch Bihar and Assam. “By looting,” writes Jadunath Sarkar, “the temples of the South and hunting out buried treasures, Mir Jumla amassed a vast fortune. The huge Hindu idols of copper were brought away in large numbers to be melted and cast into cannon. …”
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Koch Bihar (Bengal)
” … Mir Jumla made his way into Kuch Bihar by an obscure and neglected highway. …. In six days the Mughal Army reached the capital (19th December) which had been deserted by the Rajah and his people in terror. The name of the town was changed to Alamgirnagar; the muslim call to prayer, so long forbidden in the city, was chanted from the lofty roof of the palace, and a mosque was built by DEMOLISHING THE PRINCIPLE TEMPLE…”
6. “Kalimat-i-Tayyibat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah
This is a collection of letters and orders of Aurangzeb compiled by ‘Inayatullah in AD 1719 and covers the years 1699-1704 of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Somnath (Gujarat)
“… The TEMPLE OF SOMNATH WAS DEMOLISHED early in my reign and idol worship (there) put down. It is not known what the state of things there is at present. If the idolators have again taken to the worship of images at the place, THEN DESTROY THE TEMPLE IN SUCH A WAY THAT NO TRACE OF THE BUILDING MAY BE LEFT, and also expel them (the worshippers) from the place. …”
Satara (Maharashtra)
“… The village of Sattara near Aurangabad was my hunting ground. Here on the top of the hill, STOOD A TEMPLE WITH AN IMAGE OF KHANDE RAI. BY GOD’S GRACE I DEMOLISHED IT, AND FORBADE THE TEMPLE DANCERS (muralis) to ply their shameful profession…”
General Observation “… THE DEMOLITION OF A TEMPLE IS POSSIBLE AT ANY TIME, as it cannot walk away from its place. …”
Sirhind (Punjab)
“… In a small village in the sarkar of Sirhind, A SIKH TEMPLE WAS DEMOLISHED AND CONVERTED INTO A MOSQUE. An imam was appointed who was subsequently killed. …”
7. “Ganj-i-Arshadi” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
It is a contemporary account of the destruction of Hindu temples at Varanasi in the reign of Aurangzeb.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)
“… The infidels demolished a mosque that was under construction and wounded the artisans. When the news reached Shah Yasin, he came to Banaras from Mandyawa and collecting the Muslim weavers, DEMOLISHED THE BIG TEMPLE. A Sayyid who was an artisan by profession agreed with one Abdul Rasul to build a mosque at Banaras and accordingly the foundation was laid. Near the place there was a temple and many houses belonging to it were in the occupation of the Rajputs. The infidels decided that the construction of a mosque in the locality was not proper and that it should be razed to the ground. At night the walls of the mosque were found demolished. next day the wall was rebuilt but it was again destroyed. This happened three or four times. At last the Sayyid his himself in the corner. With the advent of night the infidels came to achieve their nefarious purpose. When Abdul Rasul gave the alarm, the infidels began to fight and the Sayyid was wounded by the Rajputs. In the meantime, the Musalman residents of the neighborhood arrived at the spot and the infidels took to their heels. The wounded muslims were taken to Shah Yasin who determined to vindicate the cause of Islam. When he came to the mosque, people collected from the neighborhood. the civil officers were outwardly inclined to side with the saint, but in reality they were afraid of the Royal displeasure on the account of the Raja, who was a courtier of the Emperor and had built the temple (near which the mosque was under construction). Shah Yasin, however, took up the sword and started for Jihad. The civil officers sent him a message that such a grave step should not be taken without the Emperor’s permission. Shah Yasin, paying no heed, sallied forth till he reached Bazar Chau Khamba through a fusillade of stones …… THE DOORS (OF TEMPLES) WERE FORCED OPEN AND THE IDOLS THROWN DOWN. THE WEAVERS AND OTHER MUSALMANS DEMOLISHED ABOUT 500 TEMPLES. They desired to destroy the temple of Beni Madho, but as lanes were barricaded, they desisted from going further….”
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
8. “Kalimat-i-Aurangzeb” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah
This is another compilation of letters and orders by ‘Inayatu’llah covering the years 1703-06 of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707) Maharashtra
“…The houses of this country (Maharashtra) are exceedingly strong and built solely of stone and iron. The hatchet-men of the Govt. in the course of my marching do not get sufficient strength and power (i.e. time) TO DESTROY AND RAZE THE TEMPLES OF THE INFIDELS that meet the eye on the way. You should appoint an orthodox inspector (darogha) who may afterwards DESTROY THEM AT LEISURE AND DIG UP THEIR FOUNDATIONS…”
9. “Muraq’at-i-Abu’I Hasan” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Maulana Abu’l Hasan
This is a collection of records and documents compiled by (the above named author) one of Aurangzeb’s officers in Bengal and Orissa during AD 1655-67.
[Modus Operandi of Muslims to Islamize a Country]
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Bengal and Orissa
“…Order issued on all faujdars of thanas, civil officers (mutasaddis), agents of jagirdars, kroris, and amlas from Katak to Medinipur on the frontier of Orissa :- The imperial paymaster Asad Khan has sent a letter written by order of the Emperor, to say, that the Emperor learning from the newsletters of the province of Orissa that at the village of Tilkuti in Medinipur a temple has been (newly) built, HAS ISSUED HIS AUGUST MANDATE FOR ITS DESTRUCTION, and THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL TEMPLES BUILT ANYWHERE IN THIS PROVINCE BY THE WORTHLESS INFIDELS. Therefore, you are commanded with extreme urgency that immediately on the receipt of this letter YOU SHOULD DESTROY THE ABOVE MENTIONED TEMPLES. EVERY IDOL-HOUSE BUILT DURING THE LAST 10 or 12 YEARS, WHETHER WITH BRICK OR CLAY, SHOULD BE DEMOLISHED WITHOUT DELAY. ALSO, DO NOT ALLOW THE CRUSHED HINDUS AND DESPICABLE INFIDELS TO REPAIR THEIR OLD TEMPLES. REPORTS OF THE DESTRUCTION OF TEMPLES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE COURT UNDER THE SEAL OF THE QAZIS and attested by PIOUS SHAIKHS…”
10. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Ishwardas Nagar
The author was a Brahman from Gujarat, born around AD 1654. Till the age of thirty he was in the service of the Chief Qazi of the empire under Aurangzeb. Later on, he took up a post under Shujat Khan, the governor of Gujarat, who appointed him Amin in the pargana of Jodhpur. His history covers almost half a century of Aurangzeb’s reign, from 1657 to 1700. There is nothing in his style which may mark him out as a Hindu.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … When the imperial army was encamping at Mathura, a holy city of the Hindus, the state of affairs with regard to temples of Mathura was brought to the notice of His Majesty. Thus, HE ORDERED THE FAUJDAR OF THE CITY, ABDUL NABI KHAN, TO RAZE TO THE GROUND EVERY TEMPLE AND TO CONSTRUCT BIG MOSQUES (over their demolished sites)…”
Udaipur (Rajasthan)
“… The Emperor, within a short time, reached Udaipur AND DESTROYED THE GATE OF DEHBARI, THE PALACES OF RANA AND THE TEMPLES OF UDAIPUR. Apart from it, the trees of his gardens were also destroyed…”
islamic jihadis should be killed…aurangzebs are there in India
How a Hindu Ruler Followed Vedic Ritual Contrary to Cruel Islamic Belief
Secularism is farce in today’s world and has no meaning because no single country in this world follows it as it makes the country leader coward and less aggressive but Hindu rulers kept balance on aggression and secularism. Shivaji gave fitting reply to muslims but never harmed innocent citizens even mlecchas (muslims). He knew the fact that muslims can never be trusted because they follow koran which teaches them to hate Hindus and non-muslims.
Now compare this to the anecdotes written by Khafi Khan, the Mohammedan historian, who certainly was not biased in the favour of Great Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj:
‘He made it a rule that, wherever his followers went plundering, they should do no harm to mosques, the Book of God, or anyone’s women. Whenever a copy of the holy Koran cam into his hands, he treated it with respect, and gave it to some of his Mussulman followers. When the women of any Hindu or Mohammedan were taken prisoners by his men and they had no friend to protect them, he watched over them.’
Hindu Aggression
1. Ahmad, Qeyamuddin (ed.), “Patna through the Ages”, New Delhi, 1988.

2. “Alberuni’s India”, translated by E.C. Sachau, New Delhi Reprint, 1983.

3. Attar, Shykh Faridu’d-Din, “Tadhkirat al-Awliya”, translated into Urdu by Maulana Z.A. Usmani.

4. Bloch J., “Indian Studies”, London, 1931.

5. Chuvin, Pierre, “A Chronicle of the Last Pagans”, Harvard, 1990.

6. Durrant, Will, “The Story of Civilization”, New York, 1972.

7. Elliot and Dowson, “History of India as told by its own Historians”, 8 volumes, Allahbad Reprint, 1964.

8. “First Encyclopedia of Islam”

9. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” by Ishwardas Nagar, trans. into English by Tasneem Ahmad, Delhi, 1978.

10. Growse, F.S. “Mathura: A District Memoir”, Reprint, Ahmedabad, 1978.

11. Hosain, Saiyid Safdar, ” The Early History of Islam,” Vol. I, Delhi Reprint, 1985.

12. “Jami Tirmizi,” Arabic text with Urdu translation by Badi’al-Zaman, Vol. I, New Delhi, 1983.

13. “Kitab Futuh Al-Buldan” of Al-Biladhuri, translated into English by F.C. Murgotte, New York, 1924.

14. “Maasir-i-Alamgiri” of Saqi Must’ad Khan, translated into English and annotated by Sir Jadunath Sarkar, Calcutta, 1947.

15. “Makke Madine di Goshati”, edited by Dr. Kulwant Singh, Patiala, 1988.

16. “The Rehala of Ibn Battuta,” translated into English by Mahdi Hussain, Baroda, 1976.

17. Sarkar, Jadunath, “History of Aurangzeb,” 3 Volumes, Calcutta, 1972, 73.



 Seven horses of sun
Suraj ka saatvaan ghoda..Still remember this title from an obscure movie I had watched on Doordarshan as a kid. The movie went on to become a classic by Shyam Benegal and the phrase has always stayed in some corner of my mind.. What could it have meant, the ‘7th Horse of the Sun’?? For that matter, why have seven horses in the first place? In Hindu mythology, Surya travels through the sky on a seven-horse, twelve-spoked chariot, driven by Arun (the brother of Garud), with its arrival heralded by Usha, the goddess of Dawn. As the Sun begins its journey in the Northern Hemisphere (Uttarayan) again, lets try to decode the mysteries of Surya and his chariot in the current post.
Surya on his chariot

A lot of people might think that this motion of the Sun mentioned in the scriptures refers to…

View original post 1,953 more words


RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA ARE NOT MYTHS BUT PART OF PAST HISTORY OF BHARAT:-Look at these Remarkable Evidences and Decide if you still want to call Ramayana and Mahabharata Mythology!
Whatever we call history will become myth someday in future, and whatever we call as myth “possibly” had a history at some point in the past. Harvard University is going to offer classes on Ramayana and Mahabharata in the upcoming fall semester with the course titled, “Indian Religions Through Their Narrative Literatures”.
“The Indian epics are long and complex narratives that speak to virtually every aspect of human experience. While the Mahabharata is a sobering tale of cataclysmic war and loss, the Ramayana is one of India’s great love stories”, says the course coordinator Anne E Monius. Yet, we are having very hard time in believing them.
Everybody is very vocal either in favor or against the historical accuracy of two of the greatest epics world has ever produced, Ramayana and Mahabharata. I don’t know to which category you belong to, but, I strongly believe both Ramayana and Mahabharata are not just figments of hyper-imaginative minds but an artful depiction of exceptional stories, with a little bit artistic freedom. It’s impossible to tell a story like Mahabharata with thousands of characters, without any history behind it. Whenever a poet tells a story, there will always be author’s liberty. He may exaggerate things or he may give importance to one character or he may ignore other. But it’s a pity that the nation, Ramayana and Mahabharat find its origin in, The Land of Ayodhya and Hastinapur, Mithila and Panchal, Kosal and Dwarka, Magadha and Anga and Kashi and Madra and Chitrakoot and Kishkindha and Kurkshetra call these two epics “Mythology”.
Here’s why I believe Mahabharata and Ramayana are Ancient Indian History and not Mythology and Westerners call them:
After modern humans were able to send satellites to the space to take the pictures of Earth from above, world came to know there is a bridge that connects India and Sri Lanka, which Ramayana referred as Rama Sethu.
Sundara Kanda states that Hanuman saw four tusked elephants guarding the palaces of Ravana, in fact, there did exist four tusked elephants in the past and modern scientists call them as ‘Gomphotheriidae’ (Yes, search for it in google). Every geographic reference that were made in Ramayana is very accurate and we can still identify the path Rama took to locate Sita after abduction. We are talking about the times of 3000 BC or earlier, it was near to impossible to travel across India extensively to make those references with such accuracy and to build temples along the path to enhance the credibility.
In 1975 the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) unearthed fourteen pillar bases of kasauti stone with Hindu motifs near the mosque at Ayodhya; reports of the excavations are available with the ASI. Emperor Ashoka was much closer to the period of Rama than we can ever be, and he erected a pillar in Lumbini to with inscription referring to visits of both Rama and Buddha to Lumbini. That means, he believed in Rama’s existence. Just because leftist historians rubbed off the archeology, history and traditions, history will not become mythology. Nobody believed Iliyad was true till troy was discovered after extensive archeology.
Ramayana explains thiti of Lord Rama’s birth time as, ‘Rama was born on the Navami tithi of Shukla Paksha of Chaitra masa (9th day of the increasing phase of the moon in the lunar month of Chaitra). At that time, the nakshatra was Punarvasu, and Sun, Mars, Saturn, Jupiter and Venus were in Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Cancer and Pisces respectively. Lagna was Cancer and Jupiter & Moon were shining together.’ According to planetarium software, birth date of Lord Rama is, 10 January 5114 BCE at 12.30 PM. Using the same software and planetary positions mentioned in Mahabharata, it has been established that Lord Krishna was born on 21st of July 3228 BCE. Those two dates cannot be some random number as we already know Rama precedes Krishna. And those detailed planetary positions can’t be imagined just to throw some date. Yes, there may be some disputes on the dates provided by planetarium software, but, dates provided by any software or any methods don’t differ by a century from the above mentioned dates. And, a century is minute when we are talking about millennials.
I don’t even know where to start to provide you with the historical evidences when it comes to Mahabharata, there are so many that one can write a book on itself. I will start with Dwaraka, kingdom of Lord Krishna, the ultimate strategist. Dwaraka was a ‘mythological’ kingdom till it was discovered under sea during 1983-1990. So, Dwaraka had been mythological city for thousands of years, while the actual city was sleeping under water for thousands of years as said by Mahabharata. Yes, in accordance with Mahabharata, Dwaraka city was drowned due to the great flood and we didn’t care to search underwater till 1983. It’s not just Dwaraka, more than 35 sites which were described in Mahabharata yielded some or other ancient items when archeologists did excavation. Indraprastha, Hastinapur and every other city that was mentioned in Mahabharata are real and exists till date. The Greek historian Megasthenes stated Chandragupta was the 138th king in the lineage of Lord Krishna.
And then, there is Kurukshetra, a battle of epic proportions. There is a divergence amongst the historians when it comes to dating the epics, however, the most agreed upon date for Kurukshetra is, 3102 BCE. Excavations in Kurukshetra which is now in Haryana yielded iron arrows and spearheads dated by thermoluminence test to 3100 BCE which is very closer to the dates arrived by the planetary positions described for Kurukshetra.
References to the Brahmastra, modern atomic bomb, was found in several occasions in both Ramayana and Mahabharata, particularly in Mahabharata. Mahabharata describes Brahmastra as, ‘An incandescent column of smoke and flame, as bright as ten thousand suns, rose with all its splendor. It was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death, which reduced to ashes the entire race of the Vrishnis and the Andhakas. The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable’. The present day excavations find that the stones in Kurukshetra were exposed to radioactive energy thousands of years ago.
We accept Maurya, Gupta and other ancient dynasties just because they found place in Greek history along with ours. What about our history that existed before Greeks? Won’t we believe our own history just because other part of the world doesn’t know how to read or write at that time? 400 years ago, we didn’t have any problem in believing Mahabharata and Ramayana actually happened. Two and half centuries of colonial rule, leftist ideology, and adulterated books have made us to question the accuracy of our own history.

lack of archaeological evidence is not an excuse to deny the existence of history. Ramayana and Mahabharata were not myths, they are ‘ithihas’, which have happened.
By bhaktvatshal kadami 

#Instanbul #Shem #RocketShip: Is this a replica (see photo) of an #ancient single-seat rocket-ship? That’s what it looks like to Zecharia Sitchin, the leading authority and scholar on the Ancient Astronaut theory. Hidden away in the Istanbul Archaeology Museum in Turkey for a quarter of a century, Sitchin recently convinced the Museum that this artifact may indeed be ancient, and not the modern forgery they concluded it must be, simply because our current view of our ancient history doesn’t include rocket-ships. In his article in Atlantis Rising Magazine, Issue 15, Sitchin describes this object as,”a sculpted scale model of what, to modern eyes, looks like a cone-nosed rocket-ship… Powered by a cluster of four exhaust engines in the back surrounding a larger exhaust engine, the rocket-ship has room for a sole pilot—actually shown and included in the sculpture.” He describes the pilot as sitting with legs folded toward his chest, and wearing a one-piece “ribbed pressure suit” which becomes boots at the feet, and gloves at the hands, and points out that since the pilot’s head is missing, we cannot know whether the pilot wore a helmet, goggles, or other headgear. The artifact measures 23 centimeters long, 9.5 cm high, 8 cm wide, or 5.7 inches long, 3.8 inches high, and 3.5 inches wide.Sitchin spent years tracking down the artifact, until he located it at the #Archaeology #Museum in #Istanbul. It was excavated at #Toprakkale, a city known in ancient times as Tuspa, where the kingdom of Urartu reigned briefly over 2500 years ago. The museum curators decided this small artifact must be a forgery because it differs from the era’s style, and more importantly, it looks like a space capsule. They reasoned that since there were no space capsules in ancient times, it must be a modern fake, a practical joke, made of plaster of Paris and marble powder.from “De Goden en de Broederschappen” However, during Sitchin’s visit to Istanbul and the Museum in September 1997, he met with the Director, Dr. Pasinli, who took the artifact from a drawer, and allowed Sitchin to examine and photograph it. It looked to Sitchin to be carved from a porous, volcanic ash stone, the details very precise. Dr. Pasinli asked Sitchin what he thought. It is not out of context, Sitchin told the Director and his colleagues, when you view various artifacts that also seem to represent an ancient, space faring civilization. In Sitchin’s “The Lost Realms,” you’ll find illustrations of artifacts that may represent bearded spacemen and rocket-ships from Mexico, and from Lebanon, what might be a rocket-ship on a landing platform. He advised the Museum directors to allow viewers to decide for themselves what it is, while stating their own doubt about the artifact’s authenticity.This was enough to convince the curators to finally put the object on public display. Be sure to have a look for yourself next time you are in Istanbul.These beings who rode in these spaceships where either the good gods who were with #Yahweh the creator, or the #serpent men that #rebelled against Yahweh.