Glorified Terrorist muslim Kings of India 

Terrorist Aurangzeb was Curse on Humanity: Killer of 4.6 Million Hindus
aurangzeb

 From krishnabhakt.com
Aurangzeb was a religious bigot, very cunning, cruel and wicked towards Hindus; true to the teachings of koran. He reversed in every respect some of the regime friendly policies of his predecessors which were based on Hindu texts.
After killing his own brothers who were bit moderate compared to aurangzeb and putting his father behind bars; barbaric aurangzeb took full control of regime and continued his fanatic way of leading a life of a terrorist muslim by forcibly converting Hindus into islam and killing those who wanted to follow Hinduism.
Why Talibans and terrorists of today revere aurangzeb can be known from the fact that he outlawed music and other performances in 1668. All artists were forbidden to sing, play musical instruments or to dance or paint or practice art. Anything that had to with moral plays, kathas even Ram Leelas were deemed illegal by fanatic aurangzeb.
Contents 

1 Destructed Hindu Temples

2 Ruining Vedic Symbols for Islamization

3 Aurangzeb Followed Legacy of Terrorism Taught by his Cruel Muslim Ancestors and Islam

4 Terrorist Aurangzeb Conducted Brutal Killings of Brave Sikhs and Over 4.6 Million of Hindus

5 Raja Shambhaji (son of Shivaji) Killed on Aurungzeb’s Orders

6 The Image Below Shows Global Population Decline by Massacre – Flashbacking Hundreds of Years

7 Accounts of Temple Destruction by Historians of Aurangzeb

8 1. “Mir’at-i-Alam” by Bakhtawar Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

9 2. “Alamgir-Nama” by Mirza Muhammad Kazim Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

10 3. “Mas’ir-i-‘Alamgiri” by Saqi Must’ad Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

11 4. “Akhbarat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

12 5. “Fathiyya-i-‘Ibriyya” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

13 6. “Kalimat-i-Tayyibat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah

14 7. “Ganj-i-Arshadi” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb

15 8. “Kalimat-i-Aurangzeb” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah

16 9. “Muraq’at-i-Abu’I Hasan” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Maulana Abu’l Hasan

17 10. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Ishwardas Nagar

18 How a Hindu Ruler Followed Vedic Ritual Contrary to Cruel Islamic Belief

19 Surprise Me More:

Destructed Hindu Temples


In 1669, on hearing that certain Brahmins were giving religious lectures at Multan and Benares, he ordered ‘all governors of provinces to destroy with a willing hand the schools and temples of the Hindus. Inconsequence, the temple of Vishwanath at Benares was destroyed [Maasiri Alamgiri, which recorded numerous orders for and reports of destructions of temples. Its entry for 2 September 1669 details: “News came to court that in accordance with the Emperor’s command his officers had demolished the temple of Vishvanath at Banaras”]. Moreover, till today, the old Kashi Vishvanath temple wall is visible as a part of the walls of the Gyanvapi mosque which Aurangzeb had built at the site.
[Root Cause is Islam and 164 Terrorism Verses of Koran]
In 1672 a Hindu religious sect called the Satnamis rebelled, and was crushed with ruthless severity. In 1675, Tegh Bahadur, the ninth of the sikh gurus was taken and executed because he refused to embrace Islam.
The history of his islamic reign was over a period of nearly fifty years, spent mostly in hatred towards Hindus. Terrorist aurangzeb’s rule was gory saga of loot, r@pe, killing and genocide of Hindus.
Aurangzeb Rotting in Hell for killing Hindus and Demolishing Hindu Temples
In 1678, Raja Jaswant Singh of Marwar died. The emperor tried to seize his children and have them brought up as fanatic muslims. He adopted the same policy towards the young Maratha Prince Shahu. Finally in 1679 he induced heavy jizya or poll-tax to earn revenues from Hindus. His one track mind of hating Hindus but not administrating the regime properly paved the way for the British conquest of India.
Ruining Vedic Symbols for Islamization


Muntakhabu-l Lubab by Khafi Khan:

How much Aurangzeb Hated Hindus

1. “In the former reigns one side of the coins had been adorned with the words of the creed and the names of the first four Caliphs; but as the coins pass into many unworthy places, and may fall under feet of Hindus, it was ordered that this superscription should be changed.”
How Scientific calendar representing Vedic fire worshipping format was changed to less accurate Mohammedan calendar

2. “Since the reign of Emperor Akbar the official year of account and the years of the reign had been reckoned from the Ist Farwadi, when the sun enters Aries, to the end of Isfandiyar, and the year and the months were called Ilahi; but resembled the system of the fire worshippers, the Emperor in his zeal for upholding the Muhameddan rule, emphasis added) directed that the year of the reign should be reckoned by the Arab lunar year and months, and that the revenue accounts also the lunar year should be preferred to the solar. The festival of the solar new year was completely abolished.”
Aurangzeb Followed Legacy of Terrorism Taught by his Cruel Muslim Ancestors and Islam
Contemporary history leaves no doubt that Aurangzeb conducted the affairs of the State in accordance with the dictates of Islam. And for that matter Aurangzeb was not unique in destroying the temples of the Hindus and neither was it limited to India. A practice of demolishing or breaking idols started by founder of islam, Mohammed, has continued to this day. The recent manifestation being destruction of Buddha statues at Bamiyan in Afghanistan and demolition of hundreds of Hindu, non-muslim temples in pakistan, bangladesh and burma.
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
Islamic literary sources provide far more extensive evidence of temple destruction by the Muslim invaders of India in medieval times. They also cover a large area, from Sinkiang and Transoxiana in the North to Tamil Nadu in the South, and from Siestan province of present day Iran in the West to Assam in the East. This vast area, which was long the cradle of hindu culture, came to be littered with the ruins of temples and monasteries, belonging to all schools of Santana Dharma – Baudhha, Jaina, Shaiva, Sakta, Vaishnava, and the rest. Archaeological explorations and excavations in modern times have proved unmistakably that most of the mosques, mazars, ziarats and dargahs which were built in this area, stood on the sites of and were made from the materials of deliberately demolished Hindu monuments.
Hundreds of medieval muslim historians who flourished in India and elsewhere in the world of Islam, have written detailed accounts of what their heroes did in various parts of the extensive Hindu homeland as they were invaded one after another. It is alear from the literary evidence collected alone that all Muslim rulers destroyed or desecrated Hindu temples whenever and wherever they could. Archaeological evidence from various Muslim monuments, particularly mosques and dargahs, not only confirms the literary evidence but also adds the names of some Muslim rulers whom Muslim historians have failed to credit with this pious performance.
Terrorist Aurangzeb Conducted Brutal Killings of Brave Sikhs and Over 4.6 Million of Hindus
Dyal Das, Mati Das and Sati Das as well as the Guru were brought to the open space in front of the Kotwali (Mati Das and Sati das were brothers, they were former Brahmins and belong to the area of Jammu, instead of converting to islam favored Sikhism). First of all Bhai Mati das was asked to become a Muslim. He replied that Sikhism was true and Islam was false. If God had favoured Islam, he would have created all men circumised. He was at once tied between two posts, and while standing erect, was sawn across from head to loins. He faced the savage operation with such compusure tranquility and fortitude that Sikh theologians included his name in the daily prayers (Ardas).
Bhai Mati Das Killed by aurangzeb
Dyal Das abused the Emperor and his courtiers at this atrocious act. He was tied up like a bundle with an iron chain and was put into large cauldron of bowling oil. He was roasted alive into a block of charcoal. Sati Das condemned the brutalities. He was hacked to pieces limb by limb. Jaita a Rangreta sikh of delhi collected the remains of these martyrs and consigned them to the river Yamuna flowing at a stone’s throw.
Dyal Das Killed by aurangzeb
Guru Tegh Bahadur Singh Killed by aurangzeb
Raja Shambhaji (son of Shivaji) Killed on Aurungzeb’s Orders
Succeeding his great father Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in April 1680, his elder son Shambhaji continued the fight against the Mughals most spiritedly for the preservation and also extension of Swarajya.
Unfortunately, a single but grave mistake and over confidence in his own safe and secure position at Sangameshwar, nestling amidst the Western Ghats, led to his chance capture along with Kavikalash and a number of other Marathas who were with him.
[Akabar Was Barbaric, Cruel and Anti-Hindu King]
On the 15th February 1689, Shambhaji and Kavi Kalash were brought to the Imperial camp dressed as buffons with long fool’s caps and bells placed on their heads, mounted on camels, with drums beating, with thousands of onlookers lining the roads. Aurangzeb was sitting in full darbar, and, at the sight of the prisoners, “descended from the throne and kneeling down on the carpet bowed his head to the ground in double thankfulness to the (anti-god) allah for this crowning victory”. Shambhaji spurned at the offer of life and loosened his tongue in abuse of the Emperor. That very night his eyes were blinded and next day the tongue of Kavi Kalash was cut out. The Muslim clerics decreed that Shambhaji should be put to death.
After undergoing a fortnight of torture and insult, on February,1689, the captives were put to a cruel and painful death on the 11th March, their limbs being hacked off one by one and their flesh thrown to the dogs. Their severed heads were stuffed with straw and exhibited in all the chief cities of the Deccan to the accompaniment of drum and trumpet (Maasir-i-‘Alamgiri, 320-25; Muntakhab-ul-Lubab, 386-88, Sarkar, Aurangzeb, IV, pp.340-44).
Sambhaji Killed by Terrorist Aurangzeb
In the painting, the entire sequence of events after Shambhaji’s arrival in the camp, his cruel death and barbaric manner in which his body was cut into pieces and fed to dogs of tulapur, have been brought out alive. The courageous manner in which Shambhaji braved death made him a martyr and washed of his earlier mistakes and actions in the eyes of the people.
The Image Below Shows Global Population Decline by Massacre – Flashbacking Hundreds of Years
Click on the image for an enlarged View
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
The Image below is closeup snapshot of main image showing that Aurangzeb killed 4.6 millions of Hindus
4.6 millions of Hindus were killed by jihadi aurangzeb for koran and islam
Accounts of Temple Destruction by Historians of Aurangzeb
Some of the literary evidence of temple destruction during Aurangzeb’s rule is listed below.
1. “Mir’at-i-Alam” by Bakhtawar Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
The author was a nobleman of Aurangzeb’s court. He died in AD 1684. the history ascribed to him was really compiled by Muhammad Baqa of Saharanpur who gave the name of his friend as its author. Baqa was a prolific writer who was invited by Bakhtawar Khan to Aurangzeb’s court and given a respectable rank. He died in AD 1683.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) General Order
” …Hindu writers have been entirely excluded from holding public offices, and ALL THE WORSHIPPING PLACES OF THE INFIDELS AND GREAT TEMPLES of these infamous people HAVE BEEN THROWN DOWN AND DESTROYED in a manner which excites astonishment at the successful completion of so difficult a task. His Majesty personally teaches the sacred kalima to many infidels with success. … All mosques in the empire are repaired at public expense…”
2. “Alamgir-Nama” by Mirza Muhammad Kazim Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
This work, written in AD 1688 contains a history of the first ten years of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) Palamau (Bihar)
” …In 1661 Aurangzeb in his zeal to uphold the law of Islam sent orders to his viceroy in Bihar, Daud Khan, to conquer Palamau. In the military operations that followed MANY TEMPLES WERE DESTROYED…”
Koch Bihar (Bengal)
” …Towards the end of the same year when Mir Jumla made a war on the Raja of Kuch Bihar, the MUGHALS DESTROYED MANY TEMPLES during the course of their operations. IDOLS WERE BROKEN AND SOME TEMPLES WERE CONVERTED INTO MOSQUES. …”
3. “Mas’ir-i-‘Alamgiri” by Saqi Must’ad Khan Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
The author completed this history in 1710 at the behest of Inayatu”llah Khan Kashmiri, Aurangzeb’s last secretary and favorite disciple in state policy and religiosity. The materials which Must’ad Khan used in this history of Aurangzeb’s reign came mostly from the State archives.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707) General Order
“…The Lord Cherisher of the faith learnt that in the provinces of Tatta, Multan, and especially at Benaras, the Brahmin misbelievers used to teach their false books in their established schools, and that admirers and students both Hindu and Muslim, used to come from great distances to these misguided men in order to acquire this vile learning. His majesty, eager to establish Islam, issues orders to the governors of all the provinces TO DEMOLISH THE SCHOOLS AND TEMPLES OF THE INFIDELS and with utmost urgency put down the teaching and the public practice of the religion of these misbelievers…”
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)
” …It was reported that, according to the Emperor’s command, his officers HAD DEMOLISHED THE TEMPLE OF VISHWANATH AT KASHI. …” Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … During this month of Ramzan abounding in miracles, the Emperor as the promoter of justice and overthrower of mischief, as the knower of truth and destroyer of oppression, as the zephyr of the garden of victory and the reviver of the faith of the Prophet, ISSUED ORDERS FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE TEMPLE SITUATED IN MATHURA FAMOUS AS THE DEHRA OF KESHO RAI. In the short time by the great exertions of his officers the DESTRUCTION OF THIS STRONG FOUNDATION OF INFIDELITY WAS ACCOMPLISHED AND ON ITS SITE A LOFTY MOSQUE WAS BUILT at the expenditure of a large sum…”
” …Praised be the August God of the faith of Islam, that in the auspicious reign of this DESTROYER OF INFIDELITY AND TURBULENCE, such a wonderful and seemingly impossible work was successfully accomplished. On seeing this instance of strength of the Emperor’s faith and the grandeur of his devotion to God, the proud Rajas were stifled and in amazement they stood like images facing the wall. THE IDOLS, LARGE AND SMALL SET WITH COSTLY JEWELS WHIC HAD BEEN SET UP IN THE TEMPLE WERE BROUGHT TO AGRA AND BURIED UNDER THE STEPS OF THE MOSQUE OF BEGUM SAHIB, IN ORDER TO BE CONTINUALLY TRODDEN UPON. The name of Mathura was changed to Islamabad. …”
Khandela (Rajasthan)
” … Darab Khan who had been sent with a strong force to punish the Rajputs of Khandela and TO DEMOLISH THE GREAT TEMPLE OF THE PLACE, attacked on March 8th/Safar 5th, and slew the three hundred and odd men who made a bold defence, not one of them escaping alive. THE TEMPLES OF KHANDELA AND SANULA AND ALL OTHER TEMPLES IN THE NEIGHBOURHOOD WERE DEMOLISHED …”
Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
” … On 24th Rabi S. (Sunday, May 25th), Khan Jahan Bahadur came from Jodhpur, AFTER DEMOLISHING THE TEMPLES and bringing with himself some cart-loads of idols, and had audience of the Emperor, who higly praised him and ordered that the idols, which were mostly jewelled, golden, silver, bronze, copper, or stone, should be cast in the yard (jilaukhanah) of the Court AND UNDER THE STEPS OF THE JAMA MOSQUE, TO BE TRODDEN UPON…”
Udaipur (Rajasthan)
” … Ruhullah Khan and Ekkataz Khan WENT TO DEMOLISH THE GREAT TEMPLE in front of the Rana’s palace, which was one of the rarest buildings of the age and the chief cause of the destruction of the life and property of the despised worshippers. Twenty ‘machator’ Rajputs who were sitting in the Temple vowed to give up their lives; first one of them came out to fight, killed some and was them himself slain, then came out another and so on, until every one of the twenty perished, after killing a large number of the imperialists including the trusted slave Ikhlas. The Temple was found empty. THE HEWERS BROKE THE IMAGES. …”
” …On Saturday, the 24th January, 1680 (2nd Muharram), the Emperor went to view lake Udaisagar, constructed by the Rana, AND ORDERED ALL THE THREE TEMPLES ON ITS BANKS TO BE DEMOLISHED. …”
” …On the 29th January/7th Muharram, Hasan Ali Khan brought to the Emperor twenty camel-loads of tents and other things captured from the Rana’s Palace and REPORTED THAT ONE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY-TWO OTHER TEMPLES IN THE ENVIRONS OF UDAIPUR HAD BEEN DESTROYED. The Khan received the title of Bahadur Alamgirshahi…”
Amber (Rajasthan)
“… Abu Turab, who had been SENT TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLES of AMBER, returned to the Court on Tuesday August 10th (Rajab 24th), and reported that HE HAD PULLED DOWN SIXTY-SIX TEMPLES. …”
Bijapur (Karnataka)
” … Hamiduddin Khan Bahadur WHO HAD GONE TO DEMOLISH A TEMPLE AND BUILD A MOSQUE (IN ITS PLACE) in Bijapur, having excellently carried his orders, came to court and gained praise and the post of darogha of gusulkhanah, which brought him near the Emperor’s person…”
General Text
“…LARGE NUMBERS OF PLACES OF WORSHIP OF THE INFIDELS AND GREAT TEMPLES OF THESE WICKED PEOPLE HAVE BEEN THROWN DOWN AND DESOLATED. Men who can see only the outside of things are filled with wonder at the successful accomplishment of such a seemingly difficult task. AND ON THE SITES OF THE TEMPLES LOFTY MOSQUES HAVE BEEN BUILT…”
Cruel Muslims Killing Hindus, Sikhs under aurangzeb
4. “Akhbarat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
These were reports from different provinces compiled in the reign of Aurangzeb.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (1658-1707)
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … The emporer learning that in the temple of Keshav Rai at Mathura there was a stone railing presented by Dara Shikoh, remarked, ‘In the Muslim faith it is a sin even to look at a temple, and this Dara Shikoh had restored a railing in a temple. This fact is not creditable to the Muhammadans. REMOVE THE RAILING.’ By his order Abdun Nabi Khan (the faujdar of Mathura) REMOVED IT…”
Ujjain (Madhya Pradesh)
[Why Hindus Should Never Trust Muslims]
” … News came from Malwa that Wazir Khan had sent Gada Beg, a slave, with 400 troopers, TO DESTROY ALL TEMPLES AROUND UJJAIN… A Rawat of the place resisted and slew Gada Beg with 121 of his men…”
Aurangabad (Maharashtra)
“…… The Emperor learnt from a secret news writer of Delhi that in Jaisinghpura Bairagis used to worship idols, and that the Censor on hearing of it had gone there, arrested Sri Krishna Bairagis and taken him with 15 idols away to his house; then the Rajputs had assembled, flocked to the Censor’s house, wounded three footmen of the Censor and tried to seize the Censor himself; so that the latter set the Bairagis free and sent the copper idols to the local subahdar …”
Pandharpur (Maharashtra)
“… The Emperor, summoning Muhammad Khalil and Khidmat Rai, the darogha of hatchet-men …. ORDERED THEM TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLE OF PANDHARPUR, and to take the butchers of the camp there AND SLAUGHTER COWS IN THE TEMPLE … It was done…”
On Way to the Deccan
” … When the war with the Rajputs was over, Aurangzeb decided to leave for the Deccan. His march seems to have been marked with A DESTRUCTION TO MANY TEMPLES on the way. On May 21, 1681, the superintendent of the labourers WAS ORDERED TO DESTROY ALL THE TEMPLES on the route…”
Lakheri ( ? – means the place is not traceable today )
” … On 27 Sept., 1681, the emperor issued orders FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLES at Lakheri…”
Rasulpur ( ? )
“… About this time, April 14, 1692, orders were issued to the provincial governor and the district faujdar TO DEMOLISH THE TEMPLES at Rasulpur…”
Sheogaon ( ? )
” … Sankar, a messenger, was sent TO DEMOLISH A TEMPLE near Sheogaon..”
Ajmer (Rajasthan)
“… Bijai Singh and several other Hindus were reported to be carrying on public worship of idols in a temple in the neighborhood of Ajmer. On 23 June, 1694, THE GOVERNER OF AJMER WAS ORDERED TO DESTROY THE TEMPLE and stop the public adoration of idol worship there…”
Wakenkhera ( ? )
” … The TEMPLE OF WAKENKHERA IN THE FORT WAS DEMOLISHED ON 2 MARCH, 1705. …”
Bhagwant Garh (Rajasthan)
“… The newswriter of Ranthambore REPORTED THE DESTRUCTION OF A TEMPLE IN PARGANAH BHAGWANT GARH. Gaj Singh Gor had repaired the temple and made some additions thereto…”
Malpura (Rajasthan)
” … Royal orders FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF TEMPLES IN MALPURA TODA were received and the officers were assigned for this work…”
remove road names on mughal rulers name no aurangzeb road
5. “Fathiyya-i-‘Ibriyya” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
This is a diary of Mir Jumla’s campaigns in Kuch Bihar and Assam. “By looting,” writes Jadunath Sarkar, “the temples of the South and hunting out buried treasures, Mir Jumla amassed a vast fortune. The huge Hindu idols of copper were brought away in large numbers to be melted and cast into cannon. …”
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Koch Bihar (Bengal)
” … Mir Jumla made his way into Kuch Bihar by an obscure and neglected highway. …. In six days the Mughal Army reached the capital (19th December) which had been deserted by the Rajah and his people in terror. The name of the town was changed to Alamgirnagar; the muslim call to prayer, so long forbidden in the city, was chanted from the lofty roof of the palace, and a mosque was built by DEMOLISHING THE PRINCIPLE TEMPLE…”
6. “Kalimat-i-Tayyibat” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah
This is a collection of letters and orders of Aurangzeb compiled by ‘Inayatullah in AD 1719 and covers the years 1699-1704 of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Somnath (Gujarat)
“… The TEMPLE OF SOMNATH WAS DEMOLISHED early in my reign and idol worship (there) put down. It is not known what the state of things there is at present. If the idolators have again taken to the worship of images at the place, THEN DESTROY THE TEMPLE IN SUCH A WAY THAT NO TRACE OF THE BUILDING MAY BE LEFT, and also expel them (the worshippers) from the place. …”
Satara (Maharashtra)
“… The village of Sattara near Aurangabad was my hunting ground. Here on the top of the hill, STOOD A TEMPLE WITH AN IMAGE OF KHANDE RAI. BY GOD’S GRACE I DEMOLISHED IT, AND FORBADE THE TEMPLE DANCERS (muralis) to ply their shameful profession…”
General Observation “… THE DEMOLITION OF A TEMPLE IS POSSIBLE AT ANY TIME, as it cannot walk away from its place. …”
Sirhind (Punjab)
“… In a small village in the sarkar of Sirhind, A SIKH TEMPLE WAS DEMOLISHED AND CONVERTED INTO A MOSQUE. An imam was appointed who was subsequently killed. …”
7. “Ganj-i-Arshadi” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb
It is a contemporary account of the destruction of Hindu temples at Varanasi in the reign of Aurangzeb.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh)
“… The infidels demolished a mosque that was under construction and wounded the artisans. When the news reached Shah Yasin, he came to Banaras from Mandyawa and collecting the Muslim weavers, DEMOLISHED THE BIG TEMPLE. A Sayyid who was an artisan by profession agreed with one Abdul Rasul to build a mosque at Banaras and accordingly the foundation was laid. Near the place there was a temple and many houses belonging to it were in the occupation of the Rajputs. The infidels decided that the construction of a mosque in the locality was not proper and that it should be razed to the ground. At night the walls of the mosque were found demolished. next day the wall was rebuilt but it was again destroyed. This happened three or four times. At last the Sayyid his himself in the corner. With the advent of night the infidels came to achieve their nefarious purpose. When Abdul Rasul gave the alarm, the infidels began to fight and the Sayyid was wounded by the Rajputs. In the meantime, the Musalman residents of the neighborhood arrived at the spot and the infidels took to their heels. The wounded muslims were taken to Shah Yasin who determined to vindicate the cause of Islam. When he came to the mosque, people collected from the neighborhood. the civil officers were outwardly inclined to side with the saint, but in reality they were afraid of the Royal displeasure on the account of the Raja, who was a courtier of the Emperor and had built the temple (near which the mosque was under construction). Shah Yasin, however, took up the sword and started for Jihad. The civil officers sent him a message that such a grave step should not be taken without the Emperor’s permission. Shah Yasin, paying no heed, sallied forth till he reached Bazar Chau Khamba through a fusillade of stones …… THE DOORS (OF TEMPLES) WERE FORCED OPEN AND THE IDOLS THROWN DOWN. THE WEAVERS AND OTHER MUSALMANS DEMOLISHED ABOUT 500 TEMPLES. They desired to destroy the temple of Beni Madho, but as lanes were barricaded, they desisted from going further….”
Hindus get united and aggressive so that no aurangzeb can rise again
8. “Kalimat-i-Aurangzeb” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by ‘Inayatullah
This is another compilation of letters and orders by ‘Inayatu’llah covering the years 1703-06 of Aurangzeb’s reign.
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707) Maharashtra
“…The houses of this country (Maharashtra) are exceedingly strong and built solely of stone and iron. The hatchet-men of the Govt. in the course of my marching do not get sufficient strength and power (i.e. time) TO DESTROY AND RAZE THE TEMPLES OF THE INFIDELS that meet the eye on the way. You should appoint an orthodox inspector (darogha) who may afterwards DESTROY THEM AT LEISURE AND DIG UP THEIR FOUNDATIONS…”
9. “Muraq’at-i-Abu’I Hasan” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Maulana Abu’l Hasan
This is a collection of records and documents compiled by (the above named author) one of Aurangzeb’s officers in Bengal and Orissa during AD 1655-67.
[Modus Operandi of Muslims to Islamize a Country]
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Bengal and Orissa
“…Order issued on all faujdars of thanas, civil officers (mutasaddis), agents of jagirdars, kroris, and amlas from Katak to Medinipur on the frontier of Orissa :- The imperial paymaster Asad Khan has sent a letter written by order of the Emperor, to say, that the Emperor learning from the newsletters of the province of Orissa that at the village of Tilkuti in Medinipur a temple has been (newly) built, HAS ISSUED HIS AUGUST MANDATE FOR ITS DESTRUCTION, and THE DESTRUCTION OF ALL TEMPLES BUILT ANYWHERE IN THIS PROVINCE BY THE WORTHLESS INFIDELS. Therefore, you are commanded with extreme urgency that immediately on the receipt of this letter YOU SHOULD DESTROY THE ABOVE MENTIONED TEMPLES. EVERY IDOL-HOUSE BUILT DURING THE LAST 10 or 12 YEARS, WHETHER WITH BRICK OR CLAY, SHOULD BE DEMOLISHED WITHOUT DELAY. ALSO, DO NOT ALLOW THE CRUSHED HINDUS AND DESPICABLE INFIDELS TO REPAIR THEIR OLD TEMPLES. REPORTS OF THE DESTRUCTION OF TEMPLES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE COURT UNDER THE SEAL OF THE QAZIS and attested by PIOUS SHAIKHS…”
10. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” Account on Temple Destruction by Terrorist Aurangzeb by Ishwardas Nagar
The author was a Brahman from Gujarat, born around AD 1654. Till the age of thirty he was in the service of the Chief Qazi of the empire under Aurangzeb. Later on, he took up a post under Shujat Khan, the governor of Gujarat, who appointed him Amin in the pargana of Jodhpur. His history covers almost half a century of Aurangzeb’s reign, from 1657 to 1700. There is nothing in his style which may mark him out as a Hindu.
Excerpts:
Muhiyu’d-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb ‘Alamgir Padshah Ghazi (AD 1658-1707)
Mathura (Uttar Pradesh)
” … When the imperial army was encamping at Mathura, a holy city of the Hindus, the state of affairs with regard to temples of Mathura was brought to the notice of His Majesty. Thus, HE ORDERED THE FAUJDAR OF THE CITY, ABDUL NABI KHAN, TO RAZE TO THE GROUND EVERY TEMPLE AND TO CONSTRUCT BIG MOSQUES (over their demolished sites)…”
Udaipur (Rajasthan)
“… The Emperor, within a short time, reached Udaipur AND DESTROYED THE GATE OF DEHBARI, THE PALACES OF RANA AND THE TEMPLES OF UDAIPUR. Apart from it, the trees of his gardens were also destroyed…”
islamic jihadis should be killed…aurangzebs are there in India
How a Hindu Ruler Followed Vedic Ritual Contrary to Cruel Islamic Belief
Secularism is farce in today’s world and has no meaning because no single country in this world follows it as it makes the country leader coward and less aggressive but Hindu rulers kept balance on aggression and secularism. Shivaji gave fitting reply to muslims but never harmed innocent citizens even mlecchas (muslims). He knew the fact that muslims can never be trusted because they follow koran which teaches them to hate Hindus and non-muslims.
Now compare this to the anecdotes written by Khafi Khan, the Mohammedan historian, who certainly was not biased in the favour of Great Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj:
‘He made it a rule that, wherever his followers went plundering, they should do no harm to mosques, the Book of God, or anyone’s women. Whenever a copy of the holy Koran cam into his hands, he treated it with respect, and gave it to some of his Mussulman followers. When the women of any Hindu or Mohammedan were taken prisoners by his men and they had no friend to protect them, he watched over them.’
Hindu Aggression
Ref:
1. Ahmad, Qeyamuddin (ed.), “Patna through the Ages”, New Delhi, 1988.

2. “Alberuni’s India”, translated by E.C. Sachau, New Delhi Reprint, 1983.

3. Attar, Shykh Faridu’d-Din, “Tadhkirat al-Awliya”, translated into Urdu by Maulana Z.A. Usmani.

4. Bloch J., “Indian Studies”, London, 1931.

5. Chuvin, Pierre, “A Chronicle of the Last Pagans”, Harvard, 1990.

6. Durrant, Will, “The Story of Civilization”, New York, 1972.

7. Elliot and Dowson, “History of India as told by its own Historians”, 8 volumes, Allahbad Reprint, 1964.

8. “First Encyclopedia of Islam”

9. “Futuhat-i-Alamgiri” by Ishwardas Nagar, trans. into English by Tasneem Ahmad, Delhi, 1978.

10. Growse, F.S. “Mathura: A District Memoir”, Reprint, Ahmedabad, 1978.

11. Hosain, Saiyid Safdar, ” The Early History of Islam,” Vol. I, Delhi Reprint, 1985.

12. “Jami Tirmizi,” Arabic text with Urdu translation by Badi’al-Zaman, Vol. I, New Delhi, 1983.

13. “Kitab Futuh Al-Buldan” of Al-Biladhuri, translated into English by F.C. Murgotte, New York, 1924.

14. “Maasir-i-Alamgiri” of Saqi Must’ad Khan, translated into English and annotated by Sir Jadunath Sarkar, Calcutta, 1947.

15. “Makke Madine di Goshati”, edited by Dr. Kulwant Singh, Patiala, 1988.

16. “The Rehala of Ibn Battuta,” translated into English by Mahdi Hussain, Baroda, 1976.

17. Sarkar, Jadunath, “History of Aurangzeb,” 3 Volumes, Calcutta, 1972, 73.

Advertisements

Hindu lives do not matter

Because Hindu Lives Don’t Matter: How Global Media Hid the Plight of Hindus caught in the Rohingya Wildfire

By Amit Radha nigam

https://rightlog.in/2017/09/hindus-rohingya-crisis-01/


On August 25, scores of unidentified armed men with firearms, bombs, and knives opened coordinated and deadly attacks on Myanmar border posts and police. In the dead of night, they stormed and besieged Hindu villages in Maungdaw and started slitting their throats, stabbing them killing as many as 86 Hindus and their families in cold blood (Burmese Hindus living in the Rakhine state of Myanmar). After that, they set fires to their houses in Fakira Bazar, Riktapara and Chikonchhari villages rendering nearly 200 families homeless.

As a result, more than 400 Hindus along with their families from Maungdaw state fled to Bangladesh through Rezu Amtola border in Ukhia upazila of Cox’s Bazar district. They are currently being sheltered in the Paschim Hindupara of Katupalong camp in dilapidated makeshifts arrangement with very limited or no access to basic food and health services. Along the bordering areas of Baishfari, Chakdhala and Tambru, more around 200 Hindus along with Rohingyas are still stranded in the no man’s land as on August 31.

Rakhine crises that dates back to 1977 is a humanitarian crises faced by Hindus and Muslims alike. It was triggered fresh when Muslim Rohingya insurgents attacked government posts killing dozens of officers and burning Buddhist monasteries and statues. But, let it be said again, that in the face of any crises such as this that both Hindus and Muslims face together, the media of this country along with their influential international partners have always disproportionately ignored to examine the exodus of the Hindus who are burning and fleeing alongside the Rohingyas (This is the stuff that books like ‘The Ministry of Utmost happiness’ should be left alone to do).

“We fled because we heard the fighting and we heard that Hindus elsewhere had been killed,” – a woman with three children said (Reported theguardian).

There are two sides of the current ongoing crises fighting against each other. ARSA (also known by the name Harakat al-Yaqeen, or “Faith Movement.”) fighting with the Myanmar government claiming they are fighting for freedom and government claiming that ARSA is a terrorist organization. The tension got escalated when in 9 October 2016, when ARSA attacked the Border Guard Police (BGP) bases in Rakhine State and later in 12 November when they killed a senior army officer. ARSA signifies the emergence of a new Muslim insurgency in Rakhine and its leader Ata Ullah, who was born in Karachi and later moved to Saudi Arabia, has garnered much support from both the countries, due to its terror activities. Reportedly, he was also trained in modern guerrilla warfare under the Taliban in Pakistan. It does not surprise me, in fact tells more about what ARSA is all about, contrary to what they say they stand for. If Myanmar’s Union Minister for Home Affairs Lt-Gen Kyaw Swe is to believe, ARSA Terrorists want to create Islamic Republic in Rakhine.

While the stand that Myanmar government has taken is condemned by Countries like US (who in the name of national security would put cameras in the bedroom of their own citizens), but I believe that the fact that several of the ARSA (also known by the name Harakat al-Yaqeen, or “Faith Movement.”) men have connections with terrorists organizations completely vindicates India’s stand in the interest of national security to not accept Rohingya Muslims as refugees. Several Muslims and politicians in India, whether in AMU or West Bengal, who are up in ante against the government for this crises, or any other that Muslims allegedly face anywhere in the world, have seldom  protested for atrocities faced by Hindus in India, Pakistan, POK districts, West Bengal or elsewhere in the world. This only indicates that the sympathy is far away from any humanitarian grounds rather than as a biased call to support their own ‘community’.

Just because Rohingya majority is of Muslims while a minority are Hindus, some of the media houses have completely ignored the terror and run-away faced by Hindus as well.

Had it been a real ‘textbook example of ethnic cleansing’, no Hindu would have died so far. Another consequence of this selective reporting is that armed insurgents, in the same cover up, have been portrayed as terrified Muslims of Rohingya. Even the Human rights mouthpieces of US have largely ignored to bring out a complete assessment of the troubles of all communities.

The right thing to do for the people and the media who are coming out in support of the Rohingya Muslims is to also voice their support for the Hindu families and the families of the killed Myanmar security officers and appeal Muslims in ARSA to lay down their arms first. It is because of them the military had to take such desperate action, lest all will be lost to the insurgents.
The moral trumpet does not blow well from one side and a Muslim insurgency like this, which begun by the terrorist attack, cannot be contained by international condemnation. Here, if you try to wash the feet like the Pope, chances are that the same would kill you before you know. However, it is imperative for the government to also ensure the safety of its innocent civilians too – be it Muslims or Hindus and there has to be a limit to collateral damage when it comes to precious lives – not just of a Muslims but of Hindus as well very much.

[1] http://www.thedailystar.net/world/southeast-asia/rohinga-crisis-hindu-people-too-fleeing-persecution-myanmar-violence-1456756

http://bdnews24.com/neighbours/2017/08/30/terrorists-want-to-create-islamic-republic-in-rakhine-myanmar-home-minister

Buddha did not convert 


There was no “Hinduism” at that time. There was a nation of many religions united under Aryan (Brahmin) law, the Constitutional Mantra of which is represented by the Yantra of the Swastika. This nationality came to be called Hinduism much later after it was defunct.. The Budha was an Arya of the Gautama Gothra who practiced Brahmanism. He was a Brahmin by religion and a Kshatriya by Varna who opted for Shivacharya Tantra and Sankhya Pramana.
Original Budhism is a peculiar mythology developed from local tribal lore in different places around a core of Brahmanism. Ashokan Budhism was Imperial like the Christianity of Paul, Charlemagne and Constantine or the Islam of Mahomet and Budhist Mendicants were often Imperial spies intended to smell out dissent and Brahmanism which would then be eradicated by ruthless “Budhist” soldiers.. 
Pre-Ashokan Budhism which was spread through debate and preaching is nothing but Brahmanism translated to Pali and other languages and then back again to eternal fissiparious confusion. 
Budha himself was an agnostic with a handful of faithful disciples whose answer to the question, “Is there Brahma”? was a half smile as he passed away. Budha was used to reform and spread Brahmanism by Brahmins. Kashyapa created Zen (good) , Koushika (Padma Sambhava) took it to Tibet. Bharadwaja took it to Japan. His statue still sits outside the great temple at Nara. 
Budhism adopts the notions of Karma and Dharma that originated in the Prathamo Upanishad that was received by the Saptha Rishis (Athri, Bhrigu, Kuthsa, Vasishta, Gautama, Kashyapa and Angirasa) who are the patrilineal ancestors of the Shroutha Smartha Brahmins (I am a Kashyapa) . 
While Ashoka destroyed and plundered all the Brahmin temples and guru kulas (Sarnath and theSanchi Stupa are now the oldest buildings in his erstwhile empire), the Budhist temples of Japan, which predate Ashokan Budhism, sport the Saffron Swastika of Aryavarta Dharma rather than the Chakra of Ashoka’s tyranny, (So do India’s Jain temples). 
Japan is a classic case which has been immune to political mythology masquerading as History thanks to their Shinto-Kojiki culture which passes mouth to ear from guru to shishya as does the Shroutha Smartha tradition. The ancient Shinto-Budhist Sanju Sanjusangendo Hall of Warriors at Kyoto has 12 foot high bronze statues of the Dasha Dikpalaka of Aryan Brahmanism. The not so ancient Asakusa Budhist Temple (near Tokyo) has enormous stone statues of Virinchi (Mahasthana Praptha), and Narayana (Amithabha) installed in the garden outside the Shinto Shrine to those who built the temple and Shankara (Avalokiteshwara or Kannon) is the principal deity. These are the trinity of Gunas that come from Savitur,the Light of Surya (the Sun) which is itself formed from the light of Brahma (Mitra common to Zorastrianism and the now exterminated Gnostic Christianity-though the Mitre head dress derives its name from the original Mitra) in Brahmanism. Indra, Varuna, Rahu and Kethu guard the gates at Asakusa Temple and the temple main shrine is emblazoned with an enormous Saffron Swastika at its rear which all traditional worshipers pay obeisance to during perambulations. There is a separate shrine for Lalitha which indicates that this temple was constructed post Dravido-Aryan integration (Atharva Veda period) and pre Ashokan 
Thailand is also an interesting point here. While the majority of the population follow pre-Ashokan Budhism (distinguished by the Swasthika of Aryavartha Dharma), the State Religion is Brahmanism, and the King, Bhoomipala Athulyatheja, is an Arya Kshatriya who follows Brahmanism. So was the late Nara Utham Sihanouk of Cambodia. Budhism in India was destroyed in the backlash to Ashoka but prospered elsewhere. .
Footnote:
Gandhi, like any post 1857 “God Man,” is the “Hindoo” that the British helped create to emasculate the People of Dharma. 
Outside of the “Church”, we, the Illuminati, have always known that Titus Flavius brought about the first schism between the Gnostics and the literati to pacify the Jews and create a Christianity, via the Literati, that would be an instrument of the Roman Empire. Paul embraced the temptations of Satan repudiated by Jesus and turned Christianity into an Empire. Constantine Charlemagne James and others formed Councils that cherry picked gospels suitable for the purpose and discarded the rest. This is why present day Christians cannot perform the miracles that Jesus’ original disciples could despite claiming to be following in Jesus’ footsteps. We also know that Christianity not only failed Jesus, but also failed Satan as it got corrupted by various human virtues such as mercy, compassion, and love. This is why Satan set Christianity aside, possessed Mahomet and founded Islam: 
Ashoka did the same thing and twisted Budhism (which was a proselytizing and modified Brahmanism) to his Imperial advantage, tyranny and self glorification. The backlash all but wiped out Budhism and the Black Chakra of Ashoka’s writ in India while Budhism prospered elsewhere in China, Japan, Tibet and so on under the benign Saffron Swasthika of the Aryan Constitution. 
Uthman (3rd Khalifa) had ordered burning of all copies of Quran except his version. Abdullah Ibn Masud (person Mohammad recommended to learn Quran from) Rejected Uthman’s version and asked the people of Iraq to hide the real Quran from Uthman. The Original Quran was hidden somewhere in Iraq or Syria, destroying which is the target of descendants of Uthman and Abu Bakr, this is the reason why they are attacking the museums in Iraq & Syria. Todays muslims have a choice – to continue following Uthman’s Quran; OR to find the original Quran, follow it, and become the protected “one sect” Mohammad talked about. 
This is rather like William Hunter of the William Hunter Commission created by the British that picked up fragments of the Manu Smrithi, Vedas and so on from Max Mueller and others and twisted them and published their own perverted versions as a central pillar of their effort to create a “Hinduism” to replace the People of Dharma by eradicating Brahmanism, and the talking, walking Libraries of Aryan History, Law, Traditions and so on, The Brahmins. 
Post 1857, the British took a page from Titus Flavius to create a “Hindu” lumpen in the vacuum comprising all who were not the Deen e Kitabi with Sgt Khilafart Gandhi, MBE, leading the charge to emasculate the natives and lobotomize the People of Dharma. 
Sufism is a similar confection that attempted to disarm pockets of resistance that could not be overcome with violence through a form of “bribery”. It began with the need to motivate the enslaved architects, masons, artists, musicians and others to remain creative and productive though enslaved under the iron heel of Moslem tyranny.
The British began the eradication of Brahmins and Brahmanism post 1857. Part of the project was to create a tame Hinduism that went by the Book as trans created and approved by the British. The William Hunter Commission was entrusted with this project of creating a :”Hinduism” that would include all those who were not Deen e Kitabi as the “Hindu” lumpen independent of Brahmins and dependent on British made books. From this distortion sprang the pratings of Ambedkar, Periyar, Narayana Guru, Khilafart Gandhi and the great veneration of the Gita which is but an excerpt from a literary masterpiece that contains far more sagacious passages and has no canonical significance whatsoever other than in India’s grotesque British made courts and the lectures of latter day God Men.

Did Buddha leave hinduism
By suchindranath Aiyer

भारतीय मुसल्मानों के हिन्दु पूर्वज मुसलमान कैसे बने?

भारतीय मुसल्मानों के हिन्दु पूर्वज मुसलमान कैसे बने?

इस तथ्य को सभी स्वीकार करते हैं कि लगभग 99 प्रतिशत भारतीय मुसलमानों के पूर्वज हिन्दू थे। वह स्वधर्म को छोड़ कर कैसे मुसलमान हो गये?अधिकांश हिन्दू मानते हैं कि उनको तलवार की नोक पर मुसलमान बनाया गया अर्थात्‌ वे स्वेच्छा से मुसलमान नहीं बने। मुसलमान इसका प्रतिवाद करते हैं। उनका कहना है कि इस्लाम का तो अर्थ ही शांति का धर्म है। बलात धर्म परिवर्तन की अनुमति नहीं है। यदि किसी ने ऐसा किया अथवा करता है तो यह इस्लाम की आत्मा के विरुद्ध निंदनीय कृत्य है। अधिकांश हिन्दू मुसलमान इस कारण बने कि उन्हें अपने दम घुटाऊ धर्म की तुलना में समानता का सन्देश देने वाला इस्लाम उत्तम लगा।

इस लेख में हम इस्लमिक आक्रान्ताओं के अत्याचारों को सप्रमाण देकर यह सिद्ध करेंगे की भारतीय मुसलमानों के पूर्वज हिन्दू थे एवं उनके पूर्वजों पर इस्लामिक आक्रान्ताओं ने अनेक अत्याचार कर उन्हें जबरन धर्म परिवर्तन के लिए विवश किया था। अनेक मुसलमान भाइयों का यह कहना हैं कि भारतीय इतिहास मूलत: अंग्रेजों द्वारा रचित हैं। इसलिए निष्पक्ष नहीं है। यह असत्य है। क्यूंकि अधिकांश मुस्लिम इतिहासकार आक्रमणकारियों अथवा सुल्तानों के वेतन भोगी थे। उन्होंने अपने आका की अच्छाइयों को बढ़ा-चढ़ाकर लिखना एवं बुराइयों को छुपाकर उन्होंने अपनी स्वामी भक्ति का भरपूर परिचय दिया हैं। तथापि इस शंका के निवारण के लिए हम अधिकाधिक मुस्लिम इतिहासकारों के आधार पर रचित अंग्रेज लेखक ईलियट एंड डाउसन द्वारा संगृहीत एवं प्रामाणिक समझी जाने वाली पुस्तकों का इस लेख में प्रयोग करेंगे।

भारत पर 7वीं शताब्दी में मुहम्मद बिन क़ासिम से लेकर 18वीं शताब्दी में अहमद शाह अब्दाली तक करीब 1200 वर्षों में अनेक आक्रमणकारियों ने हिन्दुओं पर अनगिनत अत्याचार किये। धार्मिक, राजनैतिक एवं सामाजिक रूप से असंगठित होते हुए भी हिन्दू समाज ने मतान्ध अत्याचारियों का भरपूर प्रतिकार किया। सिंध के राजा दाहिर और उनके बलिदानी परिवार से लेकर वीर मराठा पानीपत के मैदान तक अब्दाली से टकराते रहे। आक्रमणकारियों का मार्ग कभी भी निष्कंटक नहीं रहा अन्यथा सम्पूर्ण भारत कभी का दारुल इस्लाम (इस्लामिक भूमि) बन गया होता। आरम्भ के आक्रमणकारी यहाँ आते, मारकाट -लूटपाट करते और वापिस चले जाते। बाद की शताब्दियों में उन्होंने न केवल भारत को अपना घर बना लिया अपितु राजसत्ता भी ग्रहण कर ली। इस लेख में हम कुछ आक्रमणकारियों जैसे मौहम्मद बिन कासिम,महमूद गजनवी, मौहम्मद गौरी और तैमूर के अत्याचारों की चर्चा करेंगे।

मौहम्मद बिन कासिम

भारत पर आक्रमण कर सिंध प्रान्त में अधिकार प्रथम बार मुहम्मद बिन कासिम को मिला था।उसके अत्याचारों से सिंध की धरती लहूलुहान हो उठी थी। कासिम से उसके अत्याचारों का बदला राजा दाहिर की दोनों पुत्रियों ने कूटनीति से लिया था।

1. प्रारंभिक विजय के पश्चात कासिम ने ईराक के गवर्नर हज्जाज को अपने पत्र में लिखा-‘दाहिर का भतीजा, उसके योद्धा और मुख्य मुख्य अधिकारी कत्ल कर दिये गये हैं। हिन्दुओं को इस्लाम में दीक्षित कर लिया गया है, अन्यथा कत्ल कर दिया गया है। मूर्ति-मंदिरों के स्थान पर मस्जिदें खड़ी कर दी गई हैं। अजान दी जाती है। [i]

2. वहीँ मुस्लिम इतिहासकार आगे लिखता है- ‘मौहम्मद बिन कासिम ने रिवाड़ी का दुर्ग विजय कर लिया। वह वहाँ दो-तीन दिन ठहरा। दुर्ग में मौजूद 6000 हिन्दू योद्धा वध कर दिये गये, उनकी पत्नियाँ, बच्चे, नौकर-चाकर सब कैद कर लिये (दास बना लिये गये)। यह संख्या लगभग 30 हजार थी। इनमें दाहिर की भानजी समेत 30 अधिकारियों की पुत्रियाँ भी थी[ii]

महमूद गजनवी

मुहम्मद गजनी का नाम भारत के अंतिम हिन्दू सम्राट पृथ्वी राज चौहान को युद्ध में हराने और बंदी बनाकर अफगानिस्तान लेकर जाने के लिए प्रसिद्द है। गजनी मजहबी उन्माद एवं मतान्धता का जीता जागता प्रतीक था।

1. भारत पर आक्रमण प्रारंभ करने से पहले इस 20 वर्षीय सुल्तान ने यह धार्मिक शपथ ली कि वह प्रति वर्ष भारत पर आक्रमण करता रहेगा, जब तक कि वह देश मूर्ति और बहुदेवता पूजा से मुक्त होकर इस्लाम स्वीकार न कर ले। अल उतबी इस सुल्तान की भारत विजय के विषय में लिखता है-‘अपने सैनिकों को शस्त्रास्त्र बाँट कर अल्लाह से मार्ग दर्शन और शक्ति की आस लगाये सुल्तान ने भारत की ओर प्रस्थान किया। पुरुषपुर (पेशावर) पहुँचकर उसने उस नगर के बाहर अपने डेरे गाड़ दिये[iii]

2. मुसलमानों को अल्लाह के शत्रु काफिरों से बदला लेते दोपहर हो गयी। इसमें 15000 काफिर मारे गये और पृथ्वी पर दरी की भाँति बिछ गये जहाँ वह जंगली पशुओं और पक्षियों का भोजन बन गये। जयपाल के गले से जो हार मिला उसका मूल्य 2 लाख दीनार था। उसके दूसरे रिद्गतेदारों और युद्ध में मारे गये लोगों की तलाशी से 4 लाख दीनार का धन मिला। इसके अतिरिक्त अल्लाह ने अपने मित्रों को 5 लाख सुन्दर गुलाम स्त्रियाँ और पुरुष भी बखशो[iv]

3. कहा जाता है कि पेशावर के पास वाये-हिन्द पर आक्रमण के समय महमूद ने महाराज जयपाल और उसके 15 मुख्य सरदारों और रिश्तेदारों को गिरफ्तार कर लिया था। सुखपाल की भाँति इनमें से कुछ मृत्यु के भय से मुसलमान हो गये। भेरा में, सिवाय उनके, जिन्होंने इस्लाम स्वीकार कर लिया, सभी निवासी कत्ल कर दिये गये। स्पष्ट है कि इस प्रकार धर्म परिवर्तन करने वालों की संखया काफी रही होगी[v]

4. मुल्तान में बड़ी संख्या में लोग मुसलमान हो गये। जब महमूद ने नवासा शाह पर (सुखपाल का धर्मान्तरण के बाद का नाम) आक्रमण किया तो उतवी के अनुसार महमूद द्वारा धर्मान्तरण का अभूतपूर्व प्रदर्शन हुआ[vi]। काश्मीर घाटी में भी बहुत से काफिरों को मुसलमान बनाया गया और उस देश में इस्लाम फैलाकर वह गजनी लौट गया[vii]

5. उतबी के अनुसार जहाँ भी महमूद जाता था, वहीं वह निवासियों को इस्लाम स्वीकार करने पर मजबूर करता था। इस बलात्‌ धर्म परिवर्तन अथवा मृत्यु का चारों ओर इतना आतंक व्याप्त हो गया था कि अनेक शासक बिना युद्ध किये ही उसके आने का समाचार सुनकर भाग खड़े होते थे। भीमपाल द्वारा चाँद राय को भागने की सलाह देने का यही कारण था कि कहीं राय महमूद के हाथ पड़कर बलात्‌ मुसलमान न बना लिया जाये जैसा कि भीमपाल के चाचा और दूसरे रिश्तेदारों के साथ हुआ था[viii]

6. 1023 ई. में किरात, नूर, लौहकोट और लाहौर पर हुए चौदहवें आक्रमण के समय किरात के शासक ने इस्लाम स्वीकार कर लिया और उसकी देखा-देखी दूसरे बहुत से लोग मुसलमान हो गये। निजामुद्‌दीन के अनुसार देश के इस भाग में इस्लाम शांतिपूर्वक भी फैल रहा था, और बलपूर्वक भी`[ix]। सुल्तान महमूद कुरान का विद्वान था और उसकी उत्तम परिभाषा कर लेता था। इसलिये यह कहना कि उसका कोई कार्य इस्लाम विरुद्ध था, झूठा है।

7. हिन्दुओं ने इस पराजय को राष्ट्रीय चुनौती के रूप में लिया। अगले आक्रमण के समय जयपाल के पुत्र आनंद पाल ने उज्जैन, ग्वालियर, कन्नौज, दिल्ली और अजमेर के राजाओं की सहायता से एक बड़ी सेना लेकर महमूद का सामना किया। फरिश्ता लिखता है कि 30,000 खोकर राजपूतों ने जो नंगे पैरों और नंगे सिर लड़ते थे, सुल्तान की सेना में घुस कर थोड़े से समय में ही तीन-चार हजार मुसलमानों को काट कर रख दिया। सुल्तान युद्ध बंद कर वापिस जाने की सोच ही रहा था कि आनंद पाल का हाथी अपने ऊपर नेपथा के अग्नि गोले के गिरने से भाग खड़ा हुआ। हिन्दू सेना भी उसके पीछे भाग खड़ी हुई[x]

8. सराय (नारदीन) का विध्वंस- सुल्तान ने (कुछ समय ठहरकर) फिर हिन्द पर आक्रमण करने का इरादा किया। अपनी घुड़सवार सेना को लेकर वह हिन्द के मध्य तक पहुँच गया। वहाँ उसने ऐसे-ऐसे शासकों को पराजित किया जिन्होंने आज तक किसी अन्य व्यक्ति के आदेशों का पालन करना नहीं सीखा था। सुल्तान ने उनकी मूर्तियाँ तोड़ डाली और उन दुष्टों को तलवार के घाट उतार दिया। उसने इन शासकों के नेता से युद्ध कर उन्हें पराजित किया। अल्लाह के मित्रों ने प्रत्येक पहाड़ी और वादी को काफिरों के खून से रंग दिया और अल्लाह ने उनको घोड़े, हाथियों और बड़ी भारी संपत्ति मिली[xi]

9. नंदना की विजय के पश्चात् सुल्तान लूट का भारी सामान ढ़ोती अपनी सेना के पीछे-पीछे चलता हुआ, वापिस लौटा। गुलाम तो इतने थे कि गजनी की गुलाम-मंडी में उनके भाव बहुत गिर गये। अपने (भारत) देश में अति प्रतिष्ठा प्राप्त लोग साधारण दुकानदारों के गुलाम होकर पतित हो गये। किन्तु यह तो अल्लाह की महानता है कि जो अपने महजब को प्रतिष्ठित करता है और मूति-पूजा को अपमानित करता है[xii]

10. थानेसर में कत्ले आम- थानेसर का शासक मूर्ति-पूजा में घोर विश्वास करता था और अल्लाह (इस्लाम) को स्वीकार करने को किसी प्रकार भी तैयार नहीं था। सुल्तान ने (उसके राज्य से) मूर्ति पूजा को समाप्त करने के लिये अपने बहादुर सैनिकों के साथ कूच किया। काफिरों के खून से, नदी लाल हो गई और उसका पानी पीने योग्य नहीं रहा। यदि सूर्य न डूब गया होता तो और अधिक शत्रु मारे जाते। अल्लाह की कृपा से विजय प्राप्त हुई जिसने इस्लाम को सदैव-सदैव के लिये सभी दूसरे मत-मतान्तरों से श्रेष्ठ स्थापित किया है, भले ही मूर्ति पूजक उसके विरुद्ध कितना ही विद्रोह क्यों न करें। सुल्तान, इतना लूट का माल लेकर लौटा जिसका कि हिसाब लगाना असंभव है। स्तुति अल्लाह की जो सारे जगत का रक्षक है कि वह इस्लाम और मुसलमानों को इतना सम्मान बख्शता है[xiii]

11. अस्नी पर आक्रमण- जब चन्देल को सुल्तान के आक्रमण का समाचार मिला तो डर के मारे उसके प्राण सूख गये। उसके सामने साक्षात मृत्यु मुँह बाये खड़ी थी। सिवाय भागने के उसके पास दूसरा विकल्प नहीं था। सुल्तान ने आदेश दिया कि उसके पाँच दुर्गों की बुनियाद तक खोद डाली जाये। वहाँ के निवासियों को उनके मल्बे में दबा दिया अथवा गुलाम बना लिया गया।चन्देल के भाग जाने के कारण सुल्तान ने निराश होकर अपनी सेना को चान्द राय पर आक्रमण करने का आदेश दिया जो हिन्द के महान शासकों में से एक है और सरसावा दुर्ग में निवास करता है[xiv]

12. सरसावा (सहारनपुर) में भयानक रक्तपात- सुल्तान ने अपने अत्यंत धार्मिक सैनिकों को इकट्‌ठा किया और द्गात्रु पर तुरन्त आक्रमण करने के आदेश दिये। फलस्वरूप बड़ी संख्या में हिन्दू मारे गये अथवा बंदी बना लिये गये। मुसलमानों ने लूट की ओर कोई ध्यान नहीं दिया जब तक कि कत्ल करते-करते उनका मन नहीं भर गया। उसके बाद ही उन्होंने मुर्दों की तलाशी लेनी प्रारंभ की जो तीन दिन तक चली। लूट में सोना, चाँदी, माणिक, सच्चे मोती, जो हाथ आये जिनका मूल्य लगभग तीस लाख दिरहम रहा होगा। गुलामों की संखया का अनुमान इस बात से लगाया जा सकता है कि प्रत्येक को 2 से लेकर 10 दिरहम तक में बेचा गया। द्गोष को गजनी ले जाया गया। दूर-दूर के देशों से व्यापारी उनको खरीदने आये। मवाराउन-नहर ईराक, खुरासान आदि मुस्लिम देश इन गुलामों से पट गये। गोरे, काले, अमीर, गरीब दासता की समान जंजीरों में बँधकर एक हो गये[xv]

13. सोमनाथ का पतन- अल-काजवीनी के अनुसार ‘जब महमूद सोमनाथ के विध्वंस के इरादे से भारत गया तो उसका विचार यही था कि (इतने बड़े उपसाय देवता के टूटने पर) हिन्दू (मूर्ति पूजा के विश्वास को त्यागकर) मुसलमान हो जायेंगे[xvi]।दिसम्बर 1025 में सोमनाथ का पतना हुआ। हिन्दुओं ने महमूद से कहा कि वह जितना धन लेना चाहे ले ले, परन्तु मूर्ति को न तोड़े। महमूद ने कहा कि वह इतिहास में मूर्ति-भंजक के नाम से विखयात होना चाहता है, मूर्ति व्यापारी के नाम से नहीं। महमूद का यह ऐतिहासिक उत्तर ही यह सिद्ध करने के लिये पर्याप्त है कि सोमनाथ के मंदिर को विध्वंस करने का उद्‌देश्य धार्मिक था, लोभ नहीं।मूर्ति तोड़ दी गई। दो करोड़ दिरहम की लूट हाथ लगी, पचास हजार हिन्दू कत्ल कर दिये गये[xvii]। लूट में मिले हीरे, जवाहरातों, सच्चे मोतियों की, जिनमें कुछ अनार के बराबर थे, गजनी में प्रदर्शनी लगाई गई जिसको देखकर वहाँ के नागरिकों और दूसरे देशों के राजदूतों की आँखें फैल गई[xviii]

मौहम्मद गौरी

मुहम्मद गौरी नाम नाम गुजरात के सोमनाथ के भव्य मंदिर के विध्वंश के कारण सबसे अधिक कुख्यात है। गौरी ने इस्लामिक जोश के चलते लाखों हिन्दुओं के लहू से अपनी तलवार को रंगा था।

1. मुस्लिम सेना ने पूर्ण विजय प्राप्त की। एक लाख नीच हिन्दू नरक सिधार गये (कत्ल कर दिये गये)। इस विजय के पश्चात्‌ इस्लामी सेना अजमेर की ओर बढ़ी-वहाँ इतना लूट का माल मिला कि लगता था कि पहाड़ों और समुद्रों ने अपने गुप्त खजानें खोल दिये हों। सुल्तान जब अजमेर में ठहरा तो उसने वहाँ के मूर्ति-मंदिरों की बुनियादों तक को खुदावा डाला और उनके स्थान पर मस्जिदें और मदरसें बना दिये, जहाँ इस्लाम और शरियत की शिक्षा दी जा सके[xix]

2. फरिश्ता के अनुसार मौहम्मद गौरी द्वारा 4 लाख ‘खोकर’ और ‘तिराहिया’ हिन्दुओं को इस्लाम ग्रहण कराया गया[xx]

3. इब्ल-अल-असीर के द्वारा बनारस के हिन्दुओं का भयानक कत्ले आम हुआ। बच्चों और स्त्रियों को छोड़कर और कोई नहीं बक्शा गया[xxi]।स्पष्ट है कि सब स्त्री और बच्चे गुलाम और मुसलमान बना लिये गये।

तैमूर लंग

तैमूर लंग अपने समय का सबसे अत्याचारी हमलावर था। उसके कारण गांव के गांव लाशों के ढेर में तब्दील हो गए थे।लाशों को जलाने वाला तक बचा नहीं था।

1. 1399 ई. में तैमूर का भारत पर भयानक आक्रमण हुआ। अपनी जीवनी ‘तुजुके तैमुरी’ में वह कुरान की इस आयत से ही प्रारंभ करता है ‘ऐ पैगम्बर काफिरों और विश्वास न लाने वालों से युद्ध करो और उन पर सखती बरतो।’ वह आगे भारत पर अपने आक्रमण का कारण बताते हुए लिखता है। ‘हिन्दुस्तान पर आक्रमण करने का मेरा ध्येय काफिर हिन्दुओं के विरुद्ध धार्मिक युद्ध करना है (जिससे) इस्लाम की सेना को भी हिन्दुओं की दौलत और मूल्यवान वस्तुएँ मिल जायें[xxii]

2. कश्मीर की सीमा पर कटोर नामी दुर्ग पर आक्रमण हुआ। उसने तमाम पुरुषों को कत्ल और स्त्रियों और बच्चों को कैद करने का आदेश दिया। फिर उन हठी काफिरों के सिरों के मीनार खड़े करने के आदेश दिये। फिर भटनेर के दुर्ग पर घेरा डाला गया। वहाँ के राजपूतों ने कुछ युद्ध के बाद हार मान ली और उन्हें क्षमादान दे दिया गया। किन्तु उनके असवाधान होते ही उन पर आक्रमण कर दिया गया। तैमूर अपनी जीवनी में लिखता है कि ‘थोड़े ही समय में दुर्ग के तमाम लोग तलवार के घाट उतार दिये गये। घंटे भर में दस हजार लोगों के सिर काटे गये। इस्लाम की तलवार ने काफिरों के रक्त में स्नान किया। उनके सरोसामान, खजाने और अनाज को भी, जो वर्षों से दुर्ग में इकट्‌ठा किया गया था, मेरे सिपाहियों ने लूट लिया। मकानों में आग लगा कर राख कर दिया। इमारतों और दुर्ग को भूमिसात कर दिया गया[xxiii]

3. दूसरा नगर सरसुती था जिस पर आक्रमण हुआ। ‘सभी काफिर हिन्दू कत्ल कर दिये गये। उनके स्त्री और बच्चे और संपत्ति हमारी हो गई। तैमूर ने जब जाटों के प्रदेश में प्रवेश किया। उसने अपनी सेना को आदेश दिया कि ‘जो भी मिल जाये, कत्ल कर दिया जाये।’ और फिर सेना के सामने जो भी ग्राम या नगर आया, उसे लूटा गया।पुरुषों को कत्ल कर दिया गया और कुछ लोगों, स्त्रियों और बच्चों को बंदी बना लिया गया[xxiv]।’

4. दिल्ली के पास लोनी हिन्दू नगर था। किन्तु कुछ मुसलमान भी बंदियों में थे। तैमूर ने आदेश दिया कि मुसलमानों को छोड़कर शेष सभी हिन्दू बंदी इस्लाम की तलवार के घाट उतार दिये जायें। इस समय तक उसके पास हिन्दू बंदियों की संखया एक लाख हो गयी थी। जब यमुना पार कर दिल्ली पर आक्रमण की तैयारी हो रही थी उसके साथ के अमीरों ने उससे कहा कि इन बंदियों को कैम्प में नहीं छोड़ा जा सकता और इन इस्लाम के शत्रुओं को स्वतंत्र कर देना भी युद्ध के नियमों के विरुद्ध होगा। तैमूर लिखता है- ‘इसलिये उन लोगों को सिवाय तलवार का भोजन बनाने के कोई मार्ग नहीं था। मैंने कैम्प में घोषणा करवा दी कि तमाम बंदी कत्ल कर दिये जायें और इस आदेश के पालन में जो भी लापरवाही करे उसे भी कत्ल कर दिया जाये और उसकी सम्पत्ति सूचना देने वाले को दे दी जाये। जब इस्लाम के गाजियों (काफिरों का कत्ल करने वालों को आदर सूचक नाम) को यह आदेश मिला तो उन्होंने तलवारें सूत लीं और अपने बंदियों को कत्ल कर दिया। उस दिन एक लाख अपवित्र मूर्ति-पूजक काफिर कत्ल कर दिये गये[xxv]

इसी प्रकार के कत्लेआम, धर्मांतरण का विवरण कुतुबुद्दीन ऐबक, इल्लतुमिश, ख़िलजी,तुगलक से लेकर तमाम मुग़लों तक का मिलता हैं। अकबर और औरंगज़ेब के जीवन के विषय में चर्चा हम अलग से करेंगे। भारत के मुसलमान आक्रमणकारियों बाबर, मौहम्मद बिन-कासिम, गौरी, गजनवी इत्यादि लुटेरों को और औरंगजेब जैसे साम्प्रदायिक बादशाह को गौरव प्रदान करते हैं और उनके द्वारा मंदिरों को तोड़कर बनाई गई मस्जिदों व दरगाहों को इस्लाम की काफिरों पर विजय और हिन्दू अपमान के स्मृति चिन्ह बनाये रखना चाहते हैं। संसार में ऐसा शायद ही कहीं देखने को मिलेगा जब एक कौम अपने पूर्वजों पर अत्याचार करने वालों को महान सम्मान देते हो और अपने पूर्वजों के अराध्य हिन्दू देवी देवताओं, भारतीय संस्कृति एवं विचारधारा के प्रति उसके मन में कोई आकर्षण न हो।

(नोट- इस लेख को लिखने में “भारतीय मुसल्मानों के हिन्दु पूरवज (मुसलमान कैसे बने)” नामक पुस्तक लेखक पुरुषोत्तम, प्रकाशक कर्ता हिन्दू राइटर फोरम, राजौरी गार्डन, दिल्ली का प्रयोग किया गया है।)

डॉ विवेक आर्य

[i] इलियटएंड डाउसन खंड-1 पृ.164

[ii] इलियटएंड डाउसन खंड-1 पृ.164

[iii] इलियटएंड डाउसन खंड-1 पृ 24-25

[iv] उपरोक्त पृ. 26

[v] के. एस. लाल : इंडियन मुस्लिम : व्हू आर दे, पृ. 6

[vi] अनेक स्थानों पर महमूद द्वारा धर्मान्तरण के लिये देखे-उतबी की पुस्तक ‘किताबें यामिनी’ का अनुवाद जेम्स रेनाल्ड्‌स द्वारा पृ. 451-463

[vii] जकरिया अल काजवीनी, के. एस. लाल, उपरोक्त पृ. 7

[viii] ईलियट एंड डाउसन, खंड-2, पृ.40 / के. एस. लाल, पूर्वोद्धत पृ. 7-8

[ix] के. एस. लाल, पूर्वोद्धत पृ. 7

[x] प्रो. एस. आर. द्गार्मा, द क्रीसेन्ट इन इंडिया, पृ. 43

[xi] ईलियट एंड डाउसन, खण्ड-2, पृ. 36

[xii] उपरोक्त, पृ.39

[xiii] उपरोक्त, पृ. 40-41

[xiv] उपरोक्त, पृ. 47

[xv] उपरोक्त, पृ. 49-50

[xvi] के. एस. लाल : इंडियन मुस्लिम व्यू आर दे, पृ. 7

[xvii] प्रो. एस. आर. शर्मा, द क्रीसेन्ट इन इंडिया, पृ. 47

[xviii] ईलियट एंड डाउसन, खण्ड-2, पृ. 35

[xix] उपरोक्त पृ. 215

[xx] के. एस. लाल : इंडियन मुस्लिम व्यू आर दे, पृ. 11

[xxi] उपरोक्त पृ.23

[xxii] सीताराम गोयल द्वारा ‘स्टोरी ऑफ इस्लामिक इम्पीरियलिज्म इन इंडिया में उद्धत, पृ. 48

[xxiii]उपरोक्त

[xxiv] उपरोक्त, पृ.49-50

[xxv] सीताराम गोयल द्वारा ‘स्टोरी ऑफ इस्लामिक इम्पीरियलिज्म इन इंडिया में उद्धत, पृ. 48